Re: You now have to pay to get your website on search engines?
- From: Big Bill <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:11:09 GMT
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 06:17:52 -0600, Dustin <dustin.davis@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>Borek wrote:
>>> I actally got my site on there a day after posting the submission:
>>> http://dmoz.org/Computers/Open_Source/Employment/
>>
>> Lucky you. I have submitted two sites in February. One was accepted
>> in June, second was not accepted up to now - and I doubt it is due
>> to the fact that the site is 'unacceptable', they just don't have
>> enough manpower to review it.
>>
>> I have nothing against DMOZ, it is worth a try - but you can't rely
>> on it. Especially when you need fast link for search engines.
>>
>> Best,
>> Borek
>
>So here's the million dollar question. What is the fastest (and
>Cheapest) way to get quality links to your site?
Write a good one and publicise it.
BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Elvis does my SEO
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- You now have to pay to get your website on search engines?
- From: omnivore_ink
- Re: You now have to pay to get your website on search engines?
- From: Big Bill
- Re: You now have to pay to get your website on search engines?
- From: Dustin
- Re: You now have to pay to get your website on search engines?
- From: Borek
- Re: You now have to pay to get your website on search engines?
- From: Dustin
- Re: You now have to pay to get your website on search engines?
- From: Borek
- Re: You now have to pay to get your website on search engines?
- From: Dustin
- You now have to pay to get your website on search engines?
- Prev by Date: Re: SEO Story
- Next by Date: Re: Google uses redirection links now and then
- Previous by thread: Re: You now have to pay to get your website on search engines?
- Next by thread: Re: You now have to pay to get your website on search engines?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|