Re: Ripping off entire content
- From: "Mikkel Møldrup-Lakjer" <mikkel@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 09:33:50 -0600
"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i en meddelelse
news:dcqipd$2d0s$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> They wouldn't ask for a link back because they have lust for your content
> (same ol' copy&paste) and do not expect any 'favours' in return. In fact,
> they probably hope you would not spot them and file a complaint. Yesterday
> I spotted a decent number of referrals from:
>
> http://sitemap-news.blogspot.com/
>
> Can you see any links in the /body/ of that item from July 31st? It is a
> carbon copy of something I wrote the very same day:
>
> http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/07/31/rss-sitemaps/
Do you ever report such spammy sites in Google SERPS to Google? I do, but I
don't know if it's worth the while. Might be if enough of us do. Worth a
try, I believe.
Doesn't MSN have a similar function?
Mikkel
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reporting Stolen Content
- From: Roy Schestowitz
- Re: Reporting Stolen Content
- References:
- How many links per page?
- From: Dan Pickard
- Re: How many links per page?
- From: wlodi
- Re: How many links per page?
- From: Dan Pickard
- Re: How many links per page?
- From: Paul Burke
- Re: How many links per page?
- From: Roy Schestowitz
- Re: How many links per page?
- From: Paul Burke
- Re: Number of Links in Site Maps
- From: Roy Schestowitz
- Re: Number of Links in Site Maps
- From: Paul Burke
- Re: Number of Links in Site Maps
- From: Roy Schestowitz
- Re: Number of Links in Site Maps
- From: Paul Burke
- Re: Ripping off entire content
- From: Roy Schestowitz
- How many links per page?
- Prev by Date: Re: Number of Links in Site Maps
- Next by Date: Re: Significance of PageRank
- Previous by thread: Re: Ripping off entire content
- Next by thread: Re: Reporting Stolen Content
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|