Re: Google and rel="nofollow"
- From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 00:45:22 +0100
Big Bill wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 08:51:34 +0000 (UTC), "T.J." <no1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>>How does Google react to rel="nofollow" ?
>>I put a brand new page up at the weekend which
>>only has 1 link pointing to it using rel="nofollow"
>>and within 48hrs it was indexed in Google.
>
> It means it won't credit you with anything from the passing page. get
> an ibl from a PR10 page and it won't pass any PR. For those who care
> about these things.
I don't think it ever be followed either, unless you count actual users. It
isn't just a matter of credit, but it also supresses also attention
(bandwidth) from crawlers. It allows you to control leakage of PR, which is
probably a bad thing over the long term... the death of citations and
acknowledgements.
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz
http://Schestowitz.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Google and rel="nofollow"
- From: Carol W
- Re: Google and rel="nofollow"
- References:
- Google and rel="nofollow"
- From: T.J.
- Re: Google and rel="nofollow"
- From: Big Bill
- Google and rel="nofollow"
- Prev by Date: Re: Yahoo - redirects on search page
- Next by Date: Re: "Last Updated"?
- Previous by thread: Re: Google and rel="nofollow"
- Next by thread: Re: Google and rel="nofollow"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|