Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: Big Bill <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:04:12 GMT
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:19:29 +0100, "PeterMcC" <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>www.1-script.com wrote in
><ooRDe.300699$Cl1.143511@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> Mikkel Møldrup-Lakjer wrote:
>>
>>
>>> That part of your message is promoting a news service, and thus
>>> unrelated to
>>> the group (off topic). Therefore it should only be in signatures in
>>> original
>>> posts. Most newsreaders cut off signatures when they use quotations
>>> in replies, as it is tiring to see the same signature quoted all over
>>> again in
>>> a reply. However, this requires that the signatures respect the set
>>> standard
>>> which says that the sig must begin with -- and a space. I suspect
>>> that the
>>> Usenet archive in mention deliberately contravenes the standard to
>>> avoid
>>> being cut off and in an attempt of being quoted again and again out
>>> of context. Thus, it is spam.
>>
>> Hi Mikkel,
>>
>> Thank you for the feedback. On the sig standard: I was ignorant of the
>> fact it even exists. However, it would not be a big deal to alter the
>> post stamp to add a '--' and a space - after all, I HOST the archive
>> in question! Don't have access to my site from where I'm at today,
>> but will follow up on this. So, again, thanks for the feedback
>>
>> On the question of off-topic signature: man, that's far fetched. This
>> NG is available to anyone, and you can see wide range of interests if
>> you read sigs of people that post here or in any other USENET NG for
>> that matter. Besides, what can be more relevant to
>> alt.internet.search-engines newsgroup than its own messages! I'm in
>> disagreement with you on this one.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Dmitri
>> http://www.1-script.com/install/
>> Check out my CGI scripts installation offer
>> -------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> ##-----------------------------------------------##
>> Article posted with Web Developer's USENET Archive
>> http://www.1-script.com/forums
>> no-spam read and post WWW interface to your favorite newsgroup -
>> alt.internet.search-engines - 10982 messages and counting!
>> ##-----------------------------------------------##
>
>I emailed you but your email address is forged - you're masquerading as
>someone from foo.com. If that's deliberate, it's possibly fraudulent; if
>it's "accidental", it says much about your competence.
>
>As that means of contacting you isn't available, I have posted the contents
>of the email below.
>
>*****
>
>Just as an additional comment on the sig thing, as an SEO professional, I
>was a significant contributor to the a.i.s-e group until around a year ago.
>One of the key reasons for my stopping posting was that I resented my freely
>given advice appearing on commercial web sites in their "forums".
>
>I appreciate that it's a bit of a quirky idea but, as you're discussing the
>contents of your sig, I thought it worth mentioning.
>
>*****
>
>And now back to lurking.
>
><fx:switches off light>
Didja see Dave has kill-filed ME? Heh-heh.
BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
seo that watches the river flow...
--
.
- References:
- do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: mark | r
- Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: Mikkel Møldrup-Lakjer
- Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: www.1-script.com
- Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: David
- Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: www.1-script.com
- Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: Mikkel Møldrup-Lakjer
- Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: www.1-script.com
- Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: PeterMcC
- do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- Prev by Date: Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- Next by Date: Dmoz...
- Previous by thread: Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- Next by thread: Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|