Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: "PeterMcC" <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:19:29 +0100
www.1-script.com wrote in
<ooRDe.300699$Cl1.143511@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Mikkel Møldrup-Lakjer wrote:
>
>
>> That part of your message is promoting a news service, and thus
>> unrelated to
>> the group (off topic). Therefore it should only be in signatures in
>> original
>> posts. Most newsreaders cut off signatures when they use quotations
>> in replies, as it is tiring to see the same signature quoted all over
>> again in
>> a reply. However, this requires that the signatures respect the set
>> standard
>> which says that the sig must begin with -- and a space. I suspect
>> that the
>> Usenet archive in mention deliberately contravenes the standard to
>> avoid
>> being cut off and in an attempt of being quoted again and again out
>> of context. Thus, it is spam.
>
> Hi Mikkel,
>
> Thank you for the feedback. On the sig standard: I was ignorant of the
> fact it even exists. However, it would not be a big deal to alter the
> post stamp to add a '--' and a space - after all, I HOST the archive
> in question! Don't have access to my site from where I'm at today,
> but will follow up on this. So, again, thanks for the feedback
>
> On the question of off-topic signature: man, that's far fetched. This
> NG is available to anyone, and you can see wide range of interests if
> you read sigs of people that post here or in any other USENET NG for
> that matter. Besides, what can be more relevant to
> alt.internet.search-engines newsgroup than its own messages! I'm in
> disagreement with you on this one.
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Dmitri
> http://www.1-script.com/install/
> Check out my CGI scripts installation offer
> -------------------------------------
>
>
> ##-----------------------------------------------##
> Article posted with Web Developer's USENET Archive
> http://www.1-script.com/forums
> no-spam read and post WWW interface to your favorite newsgroup -
> alt.internet.search-engines - 10982 messages and counting!
> ##-----------------------------------------------##
I emailed you but your email address is forged - you're masquerading as
someone from foo.com. If that's deliberate, it's possibly fraudulent; if
it's "accidental", it says much about your competence.
As that means of contacting you isn't available, I have posted the contents
of the email below.
*****
Just as an additional comment on the sig thing, as an SEO professional, I
was a significant contributor to the a.i.s-e group until around a year ago.
One of the key reasons for my stopping posting was that I resented my freely
given advice appearing on commercial web sites in their "forums".
I appreciate that it's a bit of a quirky idea but, as you're discussing the
contents of your sig, I thought it worth mentioning.
*****
And now back to lurking.
<fx:switches off light>
--
PeterMcC
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: Big Bill
- Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: www.1-script.com
- Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- References:
- do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: mark | r
- Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: Mikkel Møldrup-Lakjer
- Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: www.1-script.com
- Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: David
- Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: www.1-script.com
- Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: Mikkel Møldrup-Lakjer
- Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- From: www.1-script.com
- do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- Prev by Date: Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- Next by Date: Re: Why does google go no further
- Previous by thread: Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- Next by thread: Re: do IBL's from themed pages work best?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|