Re: page rank and the www prefix
- From: John Bokma <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Jul 2005 05:22:52 GMT
Borek <borek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> IMHO that's one of those unfortunate approaches that create mess on
> the web (just like & vs & thing).
Why? It really doesn't matter. Only problem is when people get lazy (like
me), and don't type the www, and get an error :-( Also, how www is
pronounced in English makes me just shiver (followed by the famous dot).
The & v.s. & thing is quite different, really.
--
John Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/
Get a SEO report of your site for just 100 USD:
http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-help.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: page rank and the www prefix
- From: Borek
- Re: page rank and the www prefix
- References:
- page rank and the www prefix
- From: Seth Russell
- Re: page rank and the www prefix
- From: Stacey
- Re: page rank and the www prefix
- From: John Bokma
- Re: page rank and the www prefix
- From: Stacey
- Re: page rank and the www prefix
- From: John Bokma
- Re: page rank and the www prefix
- From: Stacey
- Re: page rank and the www prefix
- From: Big Bill
- Re: page rank and the www prefix
- From: Stacey
- Re: page rank and the www prefix
- From: Big Bill
- Re: page rank and the www prefix
- From: Stacey
- Re: page rank and the www prefix
- From: Big Bill
- Re: page rank and the www prefix
- From: Stacey
- Re: page rank and the www prefix
- From: Borek
- page rank and the www prefix
- Prev by Date: Re: page rank and the www prefix
- Next by Date: Why is Google referencing wrong site ??
- Previous by thread: Re: page rank and the www prefix
- Next by thread: Re: page rank and the www prefix
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading