Re: xhtml table attributes
- From: "mcnewsxp" <mcbassguitar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:43:02 -0500
below is the justification my organization uses and they exlained the use of
transitional this way:
"Getting the average <my org> Web site to validate with XHTML strict,
though, with all of the pervasive technologies being used for Web
Development at <my org> (Dreamweaver, Frontpage 2003, Visual Studio,
Homesite, Notepad, etc.) - and the different skill sets of the developers
themselves (some are SMEs rather than Web Devs, some are graphic designers,
etc.) is still probably not a reasonable goal. Compliance with XHTML
Transitional gives enough flexibility for the bulk of our users."
wiki has this to say:
supports XHTML in Internet Explorer 9 (Trident version 5.0). Prior versions
can render XHTML documents authored with HTML compatibility principles and
served with a text/html MIME-type.
also this:
supports HTML 4.01, CSS Level 1, XML 1.0, and DOM Level 1, with minor
implementation gaps.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: xhtml table attributes
- From: Beauregard T. Shagnasty
- Re: xhtml table attributes
- From: notbob
- Re: xhtml table attributes
- References:
- xhtml table attributes
- From: notbob
- Re: xhtml table attributes
- From: dorayme
- Re: xhtml table attributes
- From: mcnewsxp
- Re: xhtml table attributes
- From: dorayme
- xhtml table attributes
- Prev by Date: Re: xhtml table attributes
- Next by Date: Re: xhtml table attributes
- Previous by thread: Re: xhtml table attributes
- Next by thread: Re: xhtml table attributes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|