Re: Converting transitional to strict
- From: "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 13:27:28 -0400
Neil Gould wrote:
Jonathan N. Little wrote:Neil Gould wrote:When I read the W3C specifications for the two, their "mechanisms" do notOh really? Aren't you conflating "Frames" and "iFrames"?
Conflating? Frames - iFrames same mechanism, just MS's inline take on
a bad idea...
appear to be even remotely similar, beyond the use of the term "Frame". Not
surprisingly, they don't function the same way, either.
I get that you don't like them... but that doesn't explain why they're
functionally a bad idea or should be dropped.
Okay I will not get into the exhaustive list that ample discussion can be found in the NG and online. But here is a little demo page that debunks some of the "virtues" of iframes:
<http://littleworksstudio.com/temp/usenet/iframeVincludes>
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Converting transitional to strict
- From: Neil Gould
- Re: Converting transitional to strict
- References:
- Converting transitional to strict
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: Converting transitional to strict
- From: Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: Converting transitional to strict
- From: GTalbot
- Re: Converting transitional to strict
- From: Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: Converting transitional to strict
- From: GTalbot
- Re: Converting transitional to strict
- From: dorayme
- Re: Converting transitional to strict
- From: Neil Gould
- Re: Converting transitional to strict
- From: Jonathan N. Little
- Re: Converting transitional to strict
- From: Neil Gould
- Re: Converting transitional to strict
- From: Jonathan N. Little
- Re: Converting transitional to strict
- From: Neil Gould
- Re: Converting transitional to strict
- From: Jonathan N. Little
- Re: Converting transitional to strict
- From: Neil Gould
- Converting transitional to strict
- Prev by Date: Re: Converting transitional to strict
- Next by Date: Re: Converting transitional to strict
- Previous by thread: Re: Converting transitional to strict
- Next by thread: Re: Converting transitional to strict
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|