Re: CSS for positioning
- From: dorayme <dorayme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 10:04:30 +1000
In article <JehGn.4205$V%2.2462@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Jeremy J Starcher <r3jjs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So... start with raw content. Then spruce it up.
And that means understanding (as best as it can be understood, it
is not a crystal clear idea) the ideal distinction between pure
HTML and CSS. A worthwhile and well founded idea.
--
dorayme
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Jeremy J Starcher
- Re: CSS for positioning
- References:
- CSS for positioning
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: freemont
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: freemont
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Neredbojias
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Neredbojias
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Jenn
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: rf
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Jenn
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Jonathan N. Little
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Jenn
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Jeremy J Starcher
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Jenn
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Jeremy J Starcher
- CSS for positioning
- Prev by Date: Re: CSS for positioning
- Next by Date: Re: CSS for positioning
- Previous by thread: Re: CSS for positioning
- Next by thread: Re: CSS for positioning
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|