Re: CSS for positioning
- From: "Jenn" <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 15:28:43 -0500
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hscdrk$qp7$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jenn wrote:
"freemont" wrote"
Jenn writ:
This link was provided by beauregard...
http://www.seoimage.com/meta-tag-tutorial.html Meta Keywords:
<META NAME="Keywords" CONTENT="Search Engine Placement"> The Keyword
tag once reigned as an almighty tag until Google decided to ignore
it due to webmaster spam. Webmasters flooded it with every keyword
they could thing of, relevant and irrelevant keywords were used to
eventually render this tag worthless. It is still used by other
search engine with more priority then Google. Google will consider
the tag if it has limited usage. A good useful keyword tag should
have a limited number of keywords. Somewhere between 5 and 20 is a
good range.
It was a poor example, a result I'm sure of pure haste and/or
possibly dwindling interest in presenting information to you.
<snip>
That's not the markup, mind you; that's what the webmaster(s) present
on their page. What a joke.
So much for any credibility there. The site is junk, selling snake
oil to suckers.
Keep trying to "win", instead of listening to what people tell you,
ok?
Win? I can't find any definitive information on the subject that
set's [sic] it in stone one way or another, and links provided to me
by other people such as beauregard even present conflicting
information to his own argument.
You quoted, from above: "Webmasters flooded it with every keyword they
could thing of, relevant and irrelevant keywords were used to eventually
render this tag worthless."
What part of *worthless* is too difficult for you to understand? Why is
it you continue to debate on topics you don't know anything about?
Does this text below that comment mean anything at all?
It is still used by other
search engine with more priority then Google. Google will consider
the tag if it has limited usage. A good useful keyword tag should
have a limited number of keywords. Somewhere between 5 and 20 is a
good range.
--
Jenn (from Oklahoma)
http://pqlr.org/bbs/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Peter
- Re: CSS for positioning
- References:
- CSS for positioning
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Neredbojias
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Neredbojias
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Jenn
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: rf
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Jenn
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Jonathan N. Little
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Jenn
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Jonathan N. Little
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Jenn
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Beauregard T. Shagnasty
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: freemont
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Jenn
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Beauregard T. Shagnasty
- CSS for positioning
- Prev by Date: Re: CSS for positioning
- Next by Date: Re: overlapping boxes
- Previous by thread: Re: CSS for positioning
- Next by thread: Re: CSS for positioning
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|