Re: CSS for positioning
- From: "Jenn" <nope@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 22:15:14 -0500
--
Jenn (from Oklahoma)
"Neredbojias" <neredbojias@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9D74C0707424Aneredbojiasnano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 10 May 2010, Alfred Molon <alfred_molon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <Xns9D73E8FC0710Eneredbojiasnano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Neredbojias says...
In addition, browsers will eventually drop the
legacy-supporting routines and become more "standards pure", if you
will.
Possibly yes, although I would imagine that there are lots of old web
pages which won't be updated and will continue containing legacy
code.
Certainly, but if they're not updated, they will cease to function
effectively. The day is coming; mark my words! <g>
Ideas:
http://snipurl.com/w4xqb
http://www.dynamicdrive.com/dynamicindex4/php-photoalbum.htm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: rf
- Re: CSS for positioning
- References:
- CSS for positioning
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: freemont
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: freemont
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Neredbojias
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: CSS for positioning
- From: Neredbojias
- CSS for positioning
- Prev by Date: Re: I have a problem with this:
- Next by Date: Re: CSS for positioning
- Previous by thread: Re: CSS for positioning
- Next by thread: Re: CSS for positioning
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|