Re: Image width
- From: "Nik Coughlin" <nrkn.com@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:07:34 +1200
"Nico Schuyt" <nschuyt (AT)gmail(DOT)com> wrote in message news:4a4d9a67$0$20620$dbd4b001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sorry, I thought for a moment that the "Just setting the width to 60px and not setting the height" was his suggestion for a solution.
Proportional resized:
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/test/testimage.htm
What editor are you using? The HTML and CSS resized images look _nicer_ in Firefox than the editor resized one :)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Image width
- From: Neredbojias
- Re: Image width
- References:
- Image width
- From: shapper
- Re: Image width
- From: Nico Schuyt
- Re: Image width
- From: dorayme
- Re: Image width
- From: Nico Schuyt
- Re: Image width
- From: dorayme
- Re: Image width
- From: Nico Schuyt
- Image width
- Prev by Date: Re: Image width
- Next by Date: Re: Image width
- Previous by thread: Re: Image width
- Next by thread: Re: Image width
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
