Re: min-width doubt.
- From: dorayme <doraymeRidThis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:36:36 +1000
In article
<e96db778-b53d-4266-a608-8d622ea817fe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Pirolla <rafael.pirolla@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The display of the
images are set to inline...
btw, this is default. There is much unnecessary and wrong things in your
markup... but none of it was the cause of what you were running up
against.
--
dorayme
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: min-width doubt.
- From: Pirolla
- Re: min-width doubt.
- References:
- min-width doubt.
- From: Pirolla
- Re: min-width doubt.
- From: rf
- Re: min-width doubt.
- From: Pirolla
- Re: min-width doubt.
- From: Travis Newbury
- Re: min-width doubt.
- From: Pirolla
- min-width doubt.
- Prev by Date: Re: min-width doubt.
- Next by Date: Re: min-width doubt.
- Previous by thread: Re: min-width doubt.
- Next by thread: Re: min-width doubt.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|