Re: html vs. xhtml
- From: Guy Macon <http://www.GuyMacon.com/>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:21:08 +0000
wexfordpress wrote:
I know that many books (I bought a few) think that xhtml plus CSS is
the way to go.
They are wrong. There is only one good reason to adopt XHTML at
this point in time -- because you are a geek like me who likes
experimenting with such things. For someone who just wants a good
web page, HTML 4.01 strict is the obvious choice.
--
Guy Macon
<http://www.GuyMacon.com/>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: html vs. xhtml
- From: dorayme
- Re: html vs. xhtml
- References:
- html vs. xhtml
- From: wexfordpress
- html vs. xhtml
- Prev by Date: Travis is BACK!
- Next by Date: Re: Travis is BACK!
- Previous by thread: Re: html vs. xhtml
- Next by thread: Re: html vs. xhtml
- Index(es):