Re: Frames
- From: Tim Streater <tim.streater@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 14:32:45 +0100
In article <cb9c7$483ffc06$40cba7a3$18301@xxxxxxxx>,
"Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tim Streater wrote:
In article <pan.2008.05.29.21.49.57.929158@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Blinky the Shark <no.spam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JohnW-Mpls wrote:
What is so terrible about Frames?Rather than requiring the wheel to be reinvented for you here, Google the
phrase "frames are evil".
Except that they aren't :-)
There are circumstances in which they are useful. My advice would be to
use them if they suit your purpose, and not if they don't (like
everything else).
Sure use frames, but then don't complain about all the bumps and warts
that come with them.
I don't! That's just it. Far as I can tell, they work as advertised.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Frames
- From: Travis Newbury
- Re: Frames
- From: Jonathan N. Little
- Re: Frames
- References:
- Frames
- From: JohnW-Mpls
- Re: Frames
- From: Blinky the Shark
- Re: Frames
- From: Tim Streater
- Re: Frames
- From: Jonathan N. Little
- Frames
- Prev by Date: Re: Frames
- Next by Date: Re: Frames
- Previous by thread: Re: Frames
- Next by thread: Re: Frames
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|