Re: attn dorayme and others who recognise the sig
- From: dorayme <doraymeRidThis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 12:02:26 +1000
In article <L9udnUW87KiExKLVnZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxx>,
Gus Richter <gusrichter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jim S wrote:
Would you be good enough to have a look at a couple of pages I've done.
I'm happy with the way they look, but used trial and error to get there.
If there are errors of markup/style that can be improved without changing
the look please point them out.
http://www.jimscot.myby.co.uk/jims_page_Graffiti.htm
http://www.jimscot.myby.co.uk/jims_page_BaT.htm
My screen is set to 1280x1024 and the arrows are at the bottom without
any vertical scrollbars.
If I reduce to 800x600 the arrows are also at the bottom which is
somewhere at the midpoint of the image and I must scroll down to see the
rest of the image and text (there is a vertical scrollbar).
When scrolling, the arrows move up with the image. Is this what you want?
If Jim does not want this, one way to fix is to
..nav {width: 100%;}
..up {float: left;}
..next {float: right;}
instead of
..up {
position: absolute;
left: 5px;
bottom: 5px;
}
..next {
position: absolute;
right: 5px;
bottom: 5px;
}
Jim, I have forgot if I have replied to your latest post, but try not to
use <br> to help your layout quite so much. It breaks the spirit of the
endeavour. The idea is to use CSS to do as much of the presentation, the
look, as possible. I had hoped that my examples would have been a guide
to this sort of thing. But I do realise it is hard to get the hang of
the thing in practice.
--
dorayme
.
- References:
- attn dorayme and others who recognise the sig
- From: Jim S
- Re: attn dorayme and others who recognise the sig
- From: dorayme
- Re: attn dorayme and others who recognise the sig
- From: Jim S
- Re: attn dorayme and others who recognise the sig
- From: dorayme
- Re: attn dorayme and others who recognise the sig
- From: Jim S
- Re: attn dorayme and others who recognise the sig
- From: dorayme
- Re: attn dorayme and others who recognise the sig
- From: Jim S
- Re: attn dorayme and others who recognise the sig
- From: dorayme
- Re: attn dorayme and others who recognise the sig
- From: Jim S
- Re: attn dorayme and others who recognise the sig
- From: dorayme
- Re: attn dorayme and others who recognise the sig
- From: Jim S
- Re: attn dorayme and others who recognise the sig
- From: Gus Richter
- attn dorayme and others who recognise the sig
- Prev by Date: Re: attn dorayme and others who recognise the sig
- Next by Date: Controlling the "depth" of <UL> or <LI> ??
- Previous by thread: Re: attn dorayme and others who recognise the sig
- Next by thread: Re: attn dorayme and others who recognise the sig
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|