Re: Image Question

In article <Xns9A8CA6482060neredbojiasnano@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Neredbojias <me@http://www.neredbojias.net/_eml/fliam.php> wrote:

On 26 Apr 2008, dorayme <doraymeRidThis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Well, is there any way to say have the background image transparent,
and then lay the image 'on top of' the transparent background image?
How would I do that? I'm lost there, but just an idea.

What is the point of the background image being transparent if the
image on top is needing to be the one seen?

OK, let me make a web page for you that seems to fit part of your main
description. Hold on... How about this:

<http://netweaver.com.au/alt/click.html>

Try left top.

Tsk! Tsk!

Yeah ok! Well spotted. Try it now.

A-OK. However, I'm surprised the validator validates it as "strict"
without the specific declaration. Wouldn't the doctype you've got put
things into quirks mode? (-Not that it matters in this case.)

You mean <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"

instead of

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd";>

?

Ask Harlan, he knows about these things.

--
dorayme
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Image Question
    ... and then lay the image 'on top of' the transparent background image? ... What is the point of the background image being transparent if the ... encoding labeling for this document. ... impossible to reliably validate the document. ...
    (alt.html)
  • Re: Image Question
    ... and then lay the image 'on top of' the transparent background image? ... What is the point of the background image being transparent if the ... Tsk! ... I'm surprised the validator validates it as "strict" ...
    (alt.html)
  • Re: Image Question
    ... and then lay the image 'on top of' the transparent background image? ... I'm lost there, but just an idea. ... What is the point of the background image being transparent if the ... Tsk! ...
    (alt.html)