Re: Why is Google's HTML so bad?
- From: Blinky the Shark <no.spam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:10:04 -0800
Mark wrote:
Check out this page:
http://www.google.co.uk/intl/en/options/
No doctype, table layout, presentation attributes, font tags...
If somebody posted this page here for a critique it would be ripped to
shreds.
Run it through the W3C validator:
---8<---
No DOCTYPE found! Attempting validation with HTML 4.01 Transitional.
Failed validation, 120 Errors
--->8---
HTML has to be pretty bad to fail validation against HTML 4.01
Transitional, and with no less than 120 errors.
Is this also a clue that Google doesn't really care about the quality of
HTML when ranking pages?
Google doesn't care about anything except profit, Mark.
--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project - http://improve-usenet.org
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is Google's HTML so bad?
- From: Helpful person
- Re: Why is Google's HTML so bad?
- References:
- Why is Google's HTML so bad?
- From: Mark
- Why is Google's HTML so bad?
- Prev by Date: Re: target _blank and opening a new window in Firefox
- Next by Date: Re: target _blank and opening a new window in Firefox
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is Google's HTML so bad?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is Google's HTML so bad?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|