Re: Search button
- From: "Shelly" <sheldonlg.news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:36:08 -0500
Toby A Inkster wrote:
Shelly wrote:
Would I rather just need to define a hidden field and give it the
name "type" and the value "blah" ?
Yep. That's certainly the easiest way.
If this is the case, then I am left with the single problem of the
not having an input button of type submit, but having an image
instead.
<input type=image src="foo.png" alt="Submit Your Foo Query">
If you give that input a name, then the browser should also add x,y
co- ordinates for the pixel that the user clicked on to the resultant
URL. Sometimes that's useful. Most of the time it's not.
Thank you very much. That worked like a charm. The hidden fields were
necessary.
--
Shelly
.
- References:
- Search button
- From: Shelly
- Re: Search button
- From: BootNic
- Re: Search button
- From: BootNic
- Re: Search button
- From: Shelly
- Re: Search button
- From: Toby A Inkster
- Search button
- Prev by Date: Re: Does this page work in your Firefox?
- Next by Date: Re: NET-enabling start-tag requires SHORTTAG YES
- Previous by thread: Re: Search button
- Next by thread: Why is Google's HTML so bad?
- Index(es):