Re: HTML book recomendation
- From: dorayme <doraymeRidThis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:11:56 +1100
In article <mquuk3hs1c15g1ottc4lanlcpdt57lg8in@xxxxxxx>,
Jud McCranie <youknowwhat.mccranie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:42:16 +1100, dorayme
<doraymeRidThis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Time maybe to get the printer firing...
A bunch of unbound, single-sided sheets is not a good solution.
Fair enough, but remember the revolution the computer brought in,
especially with the Mac, called Desktop Publishing? There would
be ways to print both sides, or in landscape and ready to bind
for yourself. You could make up your book to suit your interests
and knowledge. Why, you could even index it specially.
Me, I don't bother. I like single loose sheets. Advantages:
(1) Print what you want
(2) Print in a font and size comfortable to you
(3) Lighter to hold one page at a time lying back somewhere like
on a beach, under a nice tree, on a couch or bed. Don't staple
together.
(4) When you have gotten all you are likely to get from the
pages, you can put them through the printer again and on the
backs, print sudokus or 'chess mates in 2' (or 3 or 4). You get
to throw them into the recycle after solving the backs. Other
humans get to read things on molecules that have some done some
good in the world.
--
dorayme
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: HTML book recomendation
- From: Ed Mullen
- Re: HTML book recomendation
- References:
- HTML book recomendation
- From: Jud McCranie
- Re: HTML book recomendation
- From: Jonathan N. Little
- Re: HTML book recomendation
- From: Jud McCranie
- Re: HTML book recomendation
- From: dorayme
- Re: HTML book recomendation
- From: Jud McCranie
- HTML book recomendation
- Prev by Date: Re: HTML book recomendation
- Next by Date: Re: Does this page work in your Firefox?
- Previous by thread: Re: HTML book recomendation
- Next by thread: Re: HTML book recomendation
- Index(es):