Re: IE cannot open the Internet site ... Operation aborted

Bone Ur wrote:
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Sun, 25 Nov 2007 06:40:50
GMT Blinky the Shark scribed:

Worthless? Worthless?! If it weren't for us, the world (well the
oceans) would be crawling with groupers...and you know how bad that
would be from seeing the Google variety all over usenet.

Well, I was grouping groupers into the same category; they are fish,
too. However, for _you_ to denigrate groupers is
intra-phylum-discrimination.

And that's not prohibited. Especially here, high on the food chain.
:)

High and complacent. Read on...

Bordering on arrogance, in fact. :)

Furthermore, I don't think all fish are equally worthless. Those
cute little colorful ones which reside in home aquariums can be
relaxing in a hypnotic way to the duller mind. But the big ones that
eat people and

But it takes 500 of them just to make a snack.

They're a delicacy. You're only supposed to eat a few at a time.

Shark. Eat a few at a time. Hee hee.

other fish I may want to eat serve little purpose to a progressive,
advanced society.

We've been evolving longer than you have. And we're not making holes
in the ozone layer. ;)

Longer but slower. Much slower. As a matter of fact, sharks in

Now long is that in shark years?

particular pretty much hit a dead stop prior to the beginning of the Age
of Dinosaurs. Ergo, for the last 200+ million years, all they do is swim
around and take up space in the sea just like their forefishies did in

Once you're achieved perfection there is no evolutionary pressure in the
scheme of natural selection to send the species off in new directions.

the good ol' Triassic. Humans, on the other hand, evolved at least 1000
times as much in the most current 5 million years alone! Fish have
little reason to brag, -especially when one considers how ugly they are.

Humans evolved faster because they had more to imrove on and less time
to do it. Eventually, they may reach the evolutionary perfection that
sharks have. Well, probably not -- sharks have avoided the unwanted
capability to blow themselves up in massive quantities.

One of the essences of sharkness is the beauty of sleekness and balance.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project - http://improve-usenet.org
.

Relevant Pages

  • =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_Harkin:_Foolish_to_ignore_occupy_movement?=
    ... >>>the second item that comes up when I do a Google search. ... >>"Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day; ... >>he'll eat for a lifetime." ... Only when something like a shark or eagle collects the accumulate poison is there a danger. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Sharks fin soup should be banned!!!
    ... I saw a video in which the shark was finned and thrown overboard with its ... tail fin intact. ... BTW, Australians and the Kiwis eat a huge amount of shark meat, disguised ... The Americans eat 20 million lbs of sharks last year and the EU & UK ...
    (soc.culture.singapore)
  • Re: Terra firma hominids
    ... Shark has never been on land. ... Meat isn't a food for shark. ... Sharks don't attack humans. ... Shark eat meat that has ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Spring rolls, first attempt (with pics)
    ... I can eat these in the truck. ... I'm really looking forward to the shark ... Very pretty rolls. ... Please, though, don't eat shark. ...
    (rec.food.cooking)
  • Re: Terra firma hominids
    ... Shark has never been on land. ... Meat isn't a food for shark. ... Sharks don't attack humans. ... Shark eat meat that has ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)