Re: retooling and mental housecleaning



In article <nv1Ti.36337$eY.13133@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
William Gill <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

dorayme wrote:


http://www.htmldog.com/


Thanks, I had already checked them out, but didn't see anything in depth
about semantics. I'm beginning to get the idea I just need to reread
the beginner's stuff, and take notes on where I may be off the mark. I
may not be as bad off I as I thought, but sense a real disdain here for
div and span abuse, and thought I'd better brush up. I guess back to
basics is back to basics.

OK. What are some of the main things puzzling you? The meaning of
individual elements? How the meaning of some elements are more
specific than others? Which elements have some significant
meaning and which do not? How much effort to put into avoiding
basically meaningless containers like divs?

--
dorayme
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Mozilla Bug 915 "Resolved"
    ... to use a DIV rather than something specifically meaningful. ... In a web context you value add to the meaning ... That is what what HTML semantics is for: ... decimals where none existed in HTML before, ...
    (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html)
  • Re: The nature of motion, anyone have a clue?
    ... That was an interesting and respectful response, ... Many of the comments that were made recently were really about language and precise terminology -- what physics *means* when it uses the terms force, mass, energy, momentum, matter, etc. ... On the other hand, using them improperly (or, as some have tried, using a common language dictionary to dictate the meaning of the terms, as though physics is obligated to respect those meanings) leads very quickly to both misconceptions and to an underappreciation of what we know even from the basics. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: couple of general questions
    ... What is the meaning of virtual? ... cover them and give at least a basic understanding. ... to a more solid level, where only some details are unclear. ... but asking about the very basics shows that the OP hasn't read ...
    (alt.comp.lang.learn.c-cpp)
  • Re: Why Johnny cant code. The need for a simple programming language
    ... I've, as I've said, seen a number of very sophisticated BASICs. ... I have been meaning to look at Haskell, but I haven't gotten round to it ... I have to admit I'm a bit hazy about what "functional programming" is! ...
    (uk.philosophy.humanism)
  • Re: Knowing when to use "its" and "its"
    ... meaning all its own. ... Odysseus has covered the basics. ...
    (sci.lang)