Re: Weird validation result
- From: Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:27:25 -0400
X Ryl wrote:
Hi,
I've tried validate something like (declaration excluded) :
<h1>foo <div>bar</div></h1>
It doesn't validate, as <h1>'s DTD is : <!ELEMENT (%heading;) - -
(%inline;)* -- heading -->
meaning that h1 can only contains inline element.
That's strange as DIV DTD is : <!ELEMENT DIV - - (%flow;)*
-- generic language/style container -->
with flow being "block or inline"
Right, but that's irrelevant to what's happening with your code.
That's also strange as the same code with p in-place of h1 validate:
<p>foo <div>bar</div></p>
and P DTD ( <!ELEMENT P - O (%inline;)* -- paragraph --> )
is declared like H1
The difference is that H1 has "- -" and P has "- O". The end tag is optional for P, which means that the user agent closes the P element automatically as soon as it encounters the beginning of another element that can't be nested inside or the end of an element within which the P element is nested. In your example, the validator deems the P to be closed as soon as it encounters the start tag for the DIV, and it interprets the two elements as a P element *followed by* a DIV element, not as a P element *containing* a DIV element. However, the validator will also flag the closing </p> as an error because no P element is open at that point. Did you notice that?
The H1 end tag isn't optional, and since you haven't explicitly closed the H1 element at the point where the DIV begins, the validator treats your code is nesting a DIV inside the H1, which isn't allowed.
Also, both P and H1 are declared in block level elements.
This has no bearing on what they can or can't contain.
.
- References:
- Weird validation result
- From: X Ryl
- Weird validation result
- Prev by Date: Re: Footer, the beast
- Next by Date: Re: Weird validation result
- Previous by thread: Weird validation result
- Next by thread: Re: Weird validation result
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
