Re: required attribute "ALT" not specified .

On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 06:12:06 GMT dorayme scribed:

Hah hah hah! Okay, let's compromise. I'll try to be less
reactive to idiotic statements if you try to be less schizophrenic
when you fail to understand simple logic. Also, Sydney's a bit
too close to America for comfort; move to Perth.

In _our_ little exchanges, what is the simple logic I fail to
understand?

That according to the rules of English grammar, _any_ word starting a
sentence is capitalized. It may not _look_ right to you and a few
others here, but that is subjective and irrelevant. "IMacs suck" is
correct. "iMacs are good" is wrong. This is true based on
established standards and not merely my opinion or preference. To
top it all off, Toby Stinker posted and opined in a manner aligned
with the noodlism of your errancy. I was hypertensively peeved.


Boji, I made a decision a long time ago, that I should never
abandon you, no matter how schmucklike you get, as long as you
remain a bit decent. Have you no shame at all: "iMacs are ..." is
wrong because of some _rule_ that is such a mensch for you?

Why should I be ashamed of being right?

Where is it enshrined as "without exception"?

Aha, finally a sensible counterpoint. I don't know - maybe there are
exceptions galore, but since evidence of such an exception has yet to be
proffered, my premise stands pat.

And then explain, if you
can find it, why non-idiots should bow down before it in all
circumstances.

If a particular non-idiot professes to follow standards, he or she would
be uncategorically hypocritical to make personal exceptions.

(btw, is there a special day of the week that
_you_ set aside for showing respect towards it?)

Nah. I do what I wanna within the primary guidelines I've established
for myself and my woman.

And what about the argument I gave you that if there were such a
rule it would dictate that some otherwise true sentences would
then become false. Look the thread up and do your homework or I
will get Bergamot onto you.

If memory serves, said argument was vacuous and fallacious even ignoring
the fact that there _is_ such a rule which seems to have been accepted
for centuries by those in the field.

It is a big thing for me to move and you need to
explain this deal better.

I didn't think you'd seriously consider it although Perth isn't as
provincial as it used to be.

I take everything you say with the utmost seriousness. I have
contacted WA real estate agents. Of course, it will be so much
better for you when I challenge you from there. Won't in? You
will feel that much safer. Not.

My need to feel safe is exceeded only by my need for coffee and
cigarettes so I will revise my recommendation regarding your
transmigration and suggest instead a move to Riyadh. Ha ha, my id gets
giddy just thinking about you becoming sassy with the Arabs.

(who needs to be so mature?, not
me.)

Me, neither. <wink>

--
Neredbojias
He who laughs last sounds like an idiot.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Thread Pre-Emption Question . . .
    ... Not checking for failure of InitializeCriticalSection, ... not checking deallocateor failure is okay because the program will continue to run correctly although it is good practice to check this in debug builds because deallocators usually only fail because of invalid arguments. ... the correct execution of error handling logic (if the access causes unplanned exceptions before data corruption and these unplanned exceptions are caught in the same place as planned exceptions for example). ... This can, and will, corrupt real data in any number of random ways depending on the work done in the writer. ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.kernel)
  • Re: Thread Pre-Emption Question . . .
    ... Not checking for failure of InitializeCriticalSection, ... not checking deallocateor failure is okay because the program will continue to run correctly although it is good practice to check this in debug builds because deallocators usually only fail because of invalid arguments. ... correct execution of error handling logic (if the access causes unplanned exceptions before data corruption and these unplanned exceptions are caught in the same place as planned exceptions for example). ... This can, and will, corrupt real data in any number of random ways depending on the work done in the writer. ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.kernel)
  • Re: Thread Pre-Emption Question . . .
    ... Specific bugs: ... handler to catch it and it will be very difficult to construct to fail ... that do not raise exceptions on failure so their return codes must be ... this could allow a reader and writer to access the data concurrently. ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.kernel)
  • Re: Argument Checking
    ... When arguments fail during check, do you return from the call with an ... or do you throw exceptions? ... trying to figure out their bug. ... with even the longest attention spans. ...
    (comp.lang.javascript)