Re: Why is here no wc3 validation error?
- From: John Hosking <John@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 17:48:54 +0200
Knut Krueger wrote:
Hi all,
why is the code reported as valid?
IE and Opera will display nothing without the > after the link
I don't know. Maybe Jukka or Ben or somebody experienced in reading DTDs can explain why it's allowed.
I pasted your code into the "Validate by Direct Input" box at http://validator.w3.org/ and found that the code is indeed deemed to be valid. Also valid is this simpler variant:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>More of a Parse Question</title>
</head>
<body>
<p>
<A </A>
</p>
</body>
</html>
I can only guess that this is an instance of one of those little-known auto-terminating tags (although it doesn't seem to be a proper "null end tag") that seem to work because they are rooted in SGML, but which nobody (like, say, browser developers) knows about.
Sorry I can't be of more help. I'm interested in knowing the answer, too.
--
John
.
- References:
- Why is here no wc3 validation error?
- From: Knut Krueger
- Why is here no wc3 validation error?
- Prev by Date: Re: required attribute "ALT" not specified .
- Next by Date: Re: Largest site ever? The Encyclopedia of Life
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is here no wc3 validation error?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is here no wc3 validation error?
- Index(es):