Re: test message <eom>
- From: Usenet <Mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:37:37 +0100
In article <86bd4$4635fafb$40cba7a5$10895@xxxxxxxx>, Jonathan N.
Little wrote:
mark Stanton wrote:
this message was intentionally left blank.Try alt.test next time.
How did this get here?
I *have* been trying to use alt.test, and complained to my ISP that I
couldn't post to usenet.
Looks like they've been trying it out for me! I *never* post from
that address.
Sorry about that.
Mark
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: test message <eom>
- From: Jonathan N. Little
- Re: test message <eom>
- References:
- test message <eom>
- From: mark Stanton
- Re: test message <eom>
- From: Jonathan N. Little
- test message <eom>
- Prev by Date: Re: test message <eom>
- Next by Date: Re: test message <eom>
- Previous by thread: Re: test message <eom>
- Next by thread: Re: test message <eom>
- Index(es):