Re: ALA's Holy Grail is bad?
- From: "BootNic" <bootnic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:35:57 GMT
Greg N. <yodel_dodel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:[snip]
news: f12u7m$ml$1@xxxxxxxxx
dave@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
http://coolhaus.de/misc/grail.htm
No wrapper div, no absolute positioning, no negative margins, no
hacks.
This example is a 3 column layout, but I do not think it qualifies to be
classified as a "grail"
The main page content should appear near the top of the source, after
the header, followed by the right then left columns or left then right columns.
[snip]
--
BootNic Sunday, April 29, 2007 9:35 PM
When men are pure, laws are useless; when men are corrupt, laws are
broken.
*Benjamin Disraeli*
.
- References:
- ALA's Holy Grail is bad?
- From: dave
- Re: ALA's Holy Grail is bad?
- From: Toby A Inkster
- Re: ALA's Holy Grail is bad?
- From: John Hosking
- Re: ALA's Holy Grail is bad?
- From: dave
- Re: ALA's Holy Grail is bad?
- From: Beauregard T. Shagnasty
- Re: ALA's Holy Grail is bad?
- From: dave
- Re: ALA's Holy Grail is bad?
- From: Beauregard T. Shagnasty
- Re: ALA's Holy Grail is bad?
- From: dave
- Re: ALA's Holy Grail is bad?
- From: Greg N.
- ALA's Holy Grail is bad?
- Prev by Date: Re: Image gallery query
- Next by Date: Re: ALA's Holy Grail is bad?
- Previous by thread: Re: ALA's Holy Grail is bad?
- Next by thread: Re: ALA's Holy Grail is bad?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|