Re: Who owns the patent for HTML, if there is one?
- From: Toby A Inkster <usenet200703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:56:36 +0100
James Hutton wrote:
I seem to recall, but it is very hazy, that British Telecom tried at one
point to patent the hyperlink. Can anyone shed any light on this?
Indeed they did. About 8 years ago, BT noticed that they held a US patent
on hyperlinks. They proceeded to attempt to claim license fees from a
number of US ISPs. Prodigy stood up to them, so BT sued.
BT lost the case on the grounds that the technology covered in their patent
described a particular *method* of implementing hyperlinks, but hyperlinks
on the web use a different method. Same end result -- different invention
used to implement it.
Even if the judge hadn't ruled on those grounds, it is likely that BT's
patent claim could have been invalidated based in arguments of prior art.
I suppose that Prodigy chose to argue what they did, rather than arguing
prior art, because the former was an easier case to argue.
BT's original patent expired last year without any fanfare.
--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
Contact Me ~ http://tobyinkster.co.uk/contact
Geek of ~ HTML/SQL/Perl/PHP/Python*/Apache/Linux
* = I'm getting there!
.
- References:
- Who owns the patent for HTML, if there is one?
- From: Grant Robertson
- Re: Who owns the patent for HTML, if there is one?
- From: Toby A Inkster
- Re: Who owns the patent for HTML, if there is one?
- From: James Hutton
- Who owns the patent for HTML, if there is one?
- Prev by Date: Re: Who owns the patent for HTML, if there is one?
- Next by Date: Re: Who owns the patent for HTML, if there is one?
- Previous by thread: Re: Who owns the patent for HTML, if there is one?
- Next by thread: Re: Who owns the patent for HTML, if there is one?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|