Re: Controlling page margins



On 2006-08-30, Russell Campbell wrote:

It's interesting how people want to dictate how you post because that's the
way they post.

It's interesting that people generally post in a sensible manner.

One thing I've noticed in many years on the Web is that there are
many preferences on this issue and it's kind of silly to try to make
people post the way you want them to.

Usenet is *not* the Web.

Why is your way correct and mine not?

Why does 1 plus 1 equal 2 and not 3?

In my experience, most people "top post",

Not in Usenet, and not, in my experience in e-mail either, though
unfortunately it is becomming more common.

but switch to "mixed posting" (to make up a term meaning
quote/reply/quote/reply etc.) when the original post is long and
contains many points (I do this sometimes).

That makes sense. Put your reply after the relevant section.

In quite a number of different forums I find that top posting and
mixed posting are most prevelent, with "bottom posting" being used
(but IMHO it's the most irritating).

Forums are not Usenet.

I think you have to allow for people to post the way they want to.

Sure, if they want to be corrected or ignored.

It's irritating when people jump on this issue in such a small minor
post as this was. At least in a longer submission I could understand
the desire for mixed posting, but in this little thread they need
everything requoted?

In Usenet, you have no idea whether the reader has even seen any
previous posts, or whether they are available, or whether he
remembers it, after poerhaps having read dozens (or even hundreds)
of other posts before returning to the thread.

I sure don't understand why.

Try harder.

Really . . . you can't dictate people's styles. Sorry if you don't
like it, but I live with other people's posting styles and resist
lecturing, so why can't you (granted, you weren't the one that told
me how to post, but you did chime in). I do have to resist the
temptation to request a certain style when people bottom post. When
the orginal post was long, it's really irritating to have to
constantly scroll down to see the latest response, especially as it
gets copied with replies and the latest reply is way down the page.

It helps to use a good newsreader. I just press tab to go directly
to the new material, no matter how long the post is. Even without
that, it's rare for more than two or three keystrokes to be
required to get to the bottom.

An in e-mail, top posting is very, very common.

It's getting that way, unfortunately.

The main thing is that I can remember what I said and I don't need
people to do the quote/reply thing.

Perhaps you don't say very much? In a newsgroup, ythere may be
many pespondents, not just you. It is much easier if one can read
the replies chronologically.

I just want to get their response (but, as I mentioned, in long
postings or e-mails quote/reply is fine). Your preference for mixed
posting is fine, but trying to make people post a certain way is
really just a waste of time.

Not posting logically is a waste of many more people's time.

--
Chris F.A. Johnson <http://cfaj.freeshell.org>
===================================================================
Author:
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Please help Me!!
    ... I've been emailing and reading usenet for over 15 years. ... company using top posting. ... non-sports groups knows bottom posting is wrong and frowned ...
    (rec.autos.sport.nascar)
  • Re: Disc Brake v.s. Rim Brake
    ... As far as participating in Usenet goes, however, Michael's advice is correct. ... Bottom posting only makes sense if you are editing the history ...
    (rec.bicycles.tech)
  • Re: Netiquette Guidelines
    ... >> people post to the Usenet, noone can say "this is the way you do it, ... > After *years" of being called a Top Posting turd and other such nasty ... bottom, and at the time I was a top poster, but I mainly argued that it ... think that their are too many that don't respect Torgeir around here. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Photographing at MoD Sites
    ... >> Thanks to a mixture of no quote marks, and a mixture of top and bottom ... > So you're reading the posting on a newsreader that can't handle HTML? ... Probably the majority on usenet as a whole still have text only readers. ...
    (uk.railway)
  • Re: OT--(was: Taking on city hall) Top Posting vs. bottom posting
    ... Snip ... > comments into a quoted article: an inline quoted posting. ... >> (according to Bill and Larry) ... >> evolution that has happened in usenet habits recently) ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)