Re: no target="_blank"
- From: Nije Nego <"nije\"nego"@net.hr>
- Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 11:43:02 +0200
On Sat, 6 May 2006 20:12:23 +0100, Jake wrote:
In message <445cc6a3$0$3700$cb0e7fc6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan N.
Little <lws4art@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
Jake wrote:Nor is a radio or TV broadcast. Your point?
In message <8e3ti3-rjn.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Toby Inkster
<usenet200605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
Jake wrote:If you can override the author's design decision, well -- good for you.
David Dorward writes:
Author's page, but user's browser.
Exactly. Author's page -- so author gets to choose.
User's browser -- so user gets to choose.
Should a newspaper publisher be able to choose to make sure allAnd do you walk into the publisher's office and tell him he can't
readers
hold the paper in their left hand, hold it a specific distance from their
face, fold it in a particular way, and so forth? If I've bought a
newspaper, I'll read it any way I bloody like.
produce his newspaper in a certain size, with a specific typestyle,
etc. No? I thought not.
That is the point you are missing, a webpage is *not* a printed page.
You provided good comparation:
when I change channel on my tv, I want new channel to appear in same
window, if I want having more, I would use Picture in Picture option.
I would hate channels that force themselves.
--
buy, bought, bye
.
- References:
- Re: no target="_blank"
- From: Alan J. Flavell
- Re: no target="_blank"
- From: Jake
- Re: no target="_blank"
- From: David Dorward
- Re: no target="_blank"
- From: Jake
- Re: no target="_blank"
- From: Toby Inkster
- Re: no target="_blank"
- From: Jake
- Re: no target="_blank"
- From: Jonathan N. Little
- Re: no target="_blank"
- From: Jake
- Re: no target="_blank"
- Prev by Date: Re: Fixing text size
- Next by Date: Re: Fixing text size
- Previous by thread: Re: no target="_blank"
- Next by thread: Re: no target="_blank"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|