Re: Breitling - Mechanical or Quartz?
- From: "Norman M. Schwartz" <nmsz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:59:44 -0500
"Niko" <andy.farz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1169667848.615574.291450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 24, 2:24 pm, "Norman M. Schwartz" <n...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Henry" <h...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
messagenews:pan.2007.01.24.18.00.02.710055@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Practically all non-mechanical watches have a use-life of about 5-7that done once. The watch bought 10/98 is not junk yet. I've encountered
years.
After that time, moisture has its effect on them and they're junk.Major
BS. Two Aerospaces in our family continue to function fine. The
Breiling dealer I use provides lifetime free battery replacement and I
had
one
salesman who has a much older Aerospace and it looks and works perfectly.
IMO you can't find anything that even comes near it in the quartz family.
I doubt that the breitling aerospace will become junk in your lifetime.
But one question what makes it the best of the quartz--or the king of
the quartz's if you will.
The king is long gone, this is a democracy. I speak only for myself. It
wears nice, looks nice and just about does everything I look for in a watch,
even though mine does not adjust for DST.
.
- References:
- Breitling - Mechanical or Quartz?
- From: Leviatan
- Re: Breitling - Mechanical or Quartz?
- From: Henry
- Re: Breitling - Mechanical or Quartz?
- From: Norman M. Schwartz
- Re: Breitling - Mechanical or Quartz?
- From: Niko
- Breitling - Mechanical or Quartz?
- Prev by Date: Re: IWC Problems (would most certainly not have appeared with an Orbita winder)
- Next by Date: Re: IWC Problems (would most certainly not have appeared with an Orbita winder)
- Previous by thread: Re: Breitling - Mechanical or Quartz?
- Next by thread: Re: Breitling - Mechanical or Quartz?
- Index(es):