Re: IWC watch
- From: Frank Adam <fajp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:53:45 +1000
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 04:46:58 GMT, germ <germinator@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In article <56jpc2l0604ghddgpk0d7saa980fk80h7v@xxxxxxx>, Frank AdamAnd it is, which is why there isn't too much prosecution of this type
<fajp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It can well be criminal action against the owner. Possession of stolen
or illegal goods is a valid offence in probably every country.
The only thing you can think about in that case is, whether said
possession was intentional or not. Obviously in most cases, being
small time buyer, your penalty would be the loss of your investment,
but if it can be proven that you've knowingly purchased a fake watch,
then you are taking part in an illegal transaction.
Perhaps. But I would much rather see my tax dollars used by the police
for better purposes than prosecuting individual citizens buying fakes.
happening. The cops don't care about small timers, they want the big
fish.
Kinda like the Mp3 and AVI "market", the main emphasis is not on those
who download the illegal ones, it's on those who release them.
--
Regards, Frank
.
- References:
- Re: IWC watch
- From: John S.
- Re: IWC watch
- From: John S.
- Re: IWC watch
- From: Jack Denver
- Re: IWC watch
- From: Olaf Peuss
- Re: IWC watch
- From: John S.
- Re: IWC watch
- From: Tony Stanford
- Re: IWC watch
- From: Jack Denver
- Re: IWC watch
- From: Tony Stanford
- Re: IWC watch
- From: Frank Adam
- Re: IWC watch
- From: germ
- Re: IWC watch
- Prev by Date: Re: Seating a back gasket
- Next by Date: Re: Quartz GMT, any good?
- Previous by thread: Re: IWC watch
- Next by thread: Re: IWC watch
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|