My bot is bigger than your bot, ws (Re: 268 participants?)

In article <1140882371.289934.197680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
oriel36 <geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There is more sophistication in flat Earthers,that is the only
conclusion possible.

They and you have one single value to protect (24 hours/360 degrees
for axial rotation) as part of a heritage where clocks emerged from
astronomical principles and you can't do it.

You can't do it,not because it is difficult,but because Newton's agenda
is built on the false sidereal conception for axial and orbital
motion.You don't even know why it is wrong making you windbags the most
boring creatures ever to set foot on the planet.


I occasionally receive inquiries from people who have read my previous letters and want to know why I assert that by its very nature, autism finds its adherents among choleric, disorderly warmongers like Hon. Gerald Kelleher. I always try to answer such inquiries to the best of my ability and that's precisely what I'm about to do now. Before I launch into my main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Hon. Kelleher often compares himself to Jesus, usually on the grounds that I'm trying to crucify him for speaking the truth, and (2) as a result of that, the confusion that he creates is desirable and convenient to our national enemies. Now that you know where I stand on those issues, I can safely say that if he truly wanted to be helpful, Hon. Kelleher wouldn't scupper my initiative to help others to see through the empty and meaningless statements uttered by him and his satraps.

It is hardly surprising that Hon. Kelleher wants to create widespread psychological suffering. After all, this is the same xenophobic scumbag whose insensate prattle informed us that he can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom. In a previous letter, I announced my intention to stop this insanity. Naturally, this announcement caused Hon. Kelleher to mutter abuses befitting his education. Incidents like that truly demonstrate how he recently went through a classism phase in which he tried repeatedly to blitz media outlets with faxes and newsletters that highlight the good points of his childish, obstreperous half-measures. In fact, I'm not convinced that this phase of his has entirely passed. My evidence is that Hon. Kelleher is certifiably snivelling. Now, that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter. So let me corroborate it by saying that Hon. Kelleher's ballyhoos should be labeled like a pack of cigarettes. I'm thinking of something along the lines of, "Warning: It has been determined that Hon. Kelleher's newsgroup postings are intended to tear down everything that can possibly be regarded as a support of cultural elevation."

Let's look at the facts. First, it's time for Hon. Kelleher to face the music. Second, Hon. Kelleher's monographs are but a speck in a constellation of methodologies used by anarchism to foster suspicion -- if not hatred -- of "outsiders". And finally, Hon. Kelleher likes to compare his crusades to those that shaped this nation. The comparison, however, doesn't hold up beyond some uselessly broad, superficial similarities that are so vague and pointless, it's not even worth summarizing them. I won't lie to you; you may make the comment, "What does this have to do with heartless, aberrant prima donnas?" Well, once you begin to see the light, you'll realize that he is absolutely determined to believe that divine ichor flows through his veins, and he's not about to let facts or reason get in his way. Hon. Kelleher has been known to say that a plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance. That notion is so mentally deficient, I hardly know where to begin refuting it.

It's somewhat tricky to reveal the truth about Hon. Kelleher's adages, especially since the media in this country tend to ignore historical connections and are reluctant to analyze ideological positions or treat a fringe political group seriously. Hon. Kelleher accuses me of being narrow-minded. Does he claim I'm narrow-minded because I refuse to accept his claim that his activities are on the up-and-up? If so, then I guess I'm as narrow-minded as I could possibly be. My purpose here is not to stop the Huns at the gate. Well, okay, it is. But I should point out that he must think that the world has no memory. I, for one, challenge him to move from his broad derogatory generalizations to specific instances to prove otherwise.

Where does the line get drawn? The sole point of agreement between myself and detestable fiends is that Hon. Kelleher is the most blatant enemy of peace, stability, and human progress the world has ever seen. I submit that everyone should stop and mull that assertion. Then, you'll understand why when one examines the ramifications of letting Hon. Kelleher exhibit a deep disdain for all people who are not homicidal talebearers, one finds a preponderance of evidence leading to the conclusion that the basal lie that underlies all of his bad-tempered diatribes is that he defends the real needs of the working class. Translation: We have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views, but you should nevertheless be aware that Hon. Kelleher argues that he has achieved sainthood. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: If one could get a Ph.D. in Antidisestablishmentarianism, he would be the first in line to have one. If you can go more than a minute without hearing Hon. Kelleher talk about negativism, you're either deaf, dumb, or in a serious case of denial.

I note in passing that we have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we build a better world, a cleaner world, a safer world, and a saner world, or is it sufficient to advocate social change through dialogue, passive resistance, and nonviolence? Please do not stop reading here, presuming that the answer is apparent and that no further knowledge is needed. Such is indubitably not the case. In fact, I'd bet no one ever told you that feelings of inferiority are characteristic of slimy turncoats. But you knew that already. So let me add that of all of Hon. Kelleher's exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: "Trees cause more pollution than automobiles do." I don't know where he came up with this, but his statement is dead wrong. Although the Gospel According to Hon. Kelleher says that we should avoid personal responsibility, I aver that when he tells us that granting him complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air, he somehow fails to mention that questions of his motivation and intent are compelling. He fails to mention that his deeds are a gangrenous putrefaction that serves only to burn our fair cities to the ground. And he fails to mention that some people feel that I am not content to watch my liberties slip away even as I write this letter. Others suspect that Hon. Kelleher needs a refill of his medication. In the interest of clearing up the confusion, I'll make the following observation: It takes more than a mass of odious, subversive shirkers to scrap the entire constellation of pesky ideas that brought us to our present point. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to tell you a little bit about Hon. Kelleher and his pusillanimous quips. Isn't it true that Hon. Kelleher is up to no good? If that's not true, tell me why not. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that his favorite scapegoats are the government, the economy, the environment, society, parents, teachers, and just about everything else. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that if he feels ridiculed by all the attention my letters are bringing him, then that's just too darn bad. Hon. Kelleher's arrogance has brought this upon himself.

Is it not positively the distinguishing feature of Hon. Kelleher's initiatives to twist our entire societal valuation of love and relationships beyond all insanity? Even if our society had no social problems at all, we could still say that Hon. Kelleher bases his platitudes on the belief that he acts in the name of equality and social justice. The mere mention of that fact guarantees that this letter will never get published in any mass-circulation periodical that Hon. Kelleher has any control over. But that's inconsequential, because Hon. Kelleher recently claimed that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones. I would have found this comment shocking had I not heard similar garbage from him a hundred times before.

Hon. Kelleher is the type of person who can look you right in the eye and, with an expression of the utmost sincerity, tell you any kind of whopper that suits his purpose. I'll probably devote a separate letter to that topic alone, but for now, I'll simply summarize by stating that Hon. Kelleher's ability to support international crime while purporting to oppose it is astounding. What's my problem, then? Allow me to present it in the form of a question: Is Hon. Kelleher hoping that the readers of this letter won't see the weakness of his argument relative to mine? As you ponder the answer to that question, consider that I'm not very conversant with Hon. Kelleher's background. To be quite frank, I don't care to be. I already know enough to state with confidence that Hon. Kelleher must sense his own irremediable inferiority. That's why he is so desperate to control, manipulate, and harm other people; it's the only way for him to distinguish himself from the herd. It would be a lot nicer, however, if Hon. Kelleher also realized that he could really use a heart, just like the tin man in The Wizard of Oz. Am I being unduly harsh for writing that? I think not. When the religious leaders in Jesus's time were wrong, Jesus denounced them in extremely harsh terms. So why shouldn't I, too, use extremely harsh terms to indicate that in a country like ours where onanism, animalism, and antagonism run rampant, we need laws to help enforce behavior that ought to be performed out of common sense, decency, and tolerance? For the moment, Hon. Kelleher makes no secret of the fact that he presents one face to the public, a face that tells people what they want to hear. Then, in private, Hon. Kelleher devises new schemes to make our country spiritually blind. While he puts on a good dog and pony show, the justification he gave for seeking to drag men out of their beds in the dead of night and castrate them was one of the most intemperate justifications I've ever heard. It was so intemperate, in fact, that I will not repeat it here. Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite clearly: If you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that Hon. Kelleher believes that the best way to reduce cognitive dissonance and restore homeostasis to one's psyche is to cover up his criminal ineptitude. Sorry, but I have to call foul on that one. I don't get it: What is Hon. Kelleher's secret agenda? I mean, I've never bothered Hon. Kelleher. Yet Hon. Kelleher wants to suppress people's instinct and intellect. Whatever happened to "live and let live"?

Shame on Hon. Kelleher for thinking that people like you and me are socially inept! My prediction that he would vilify our history, character, values, and traditions came true so quickly, so brutally, so horribly, that even I was stunned by the magnitude and viciousness of it all. Like a verbal magician, he knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. Despite Hon. Kelleher's evident lack of grounding in what he's talking about, the baneful nature of Hon. Kelleher's witticisms is not just a rumor. It is a fact to which I can testify. Hon. Kelleher is bad enough when he's alone, but he is even worse when he's joined by inane urban guerrillas. If you ever ask him to do something, you can bet that your request will get lost in the shuffle, unaddressed, ignored, and rebuffed.

Anyone who has spent much time wading through the pious, obscurantist, jargon-filled cant that now passes for "advanced" thought in the humanities already knows that Hon. Kelleher justifies his thievery by saying things like, "It's for the good of society". What may be news, however, is that his theories are sheer hypothesis -- speculation with not even a scintilla of circumstantial evidence to support them. I always catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you that he ignores the most basic ground rule of debate. In case you're not familiar with it, that rule is: attack the idea, not the person. When Hon. Kelleher says that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable, in his mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like he believes he has said something very profound. He is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others -- and Hon. Kelleher knows it. He can't fool me. I've met phlegmatic, scornful anthropophagi before, so I know that there are some prissy, vapid desperados who are unregenerate. There are also some who are oligophrenic. Which category does Hon. Kelleher fall into? If the question overwhelms you, I suggest you check "both". Please let me explain that his vituperations are based on hate. Hate, separatism, and an intolerance of another viewpoint, another way of life. Hon. Kelleher's nostrums are a spiritual syphilis that has now reached the tertiary stage, paresis and insanity. By the way, saying that last sentence out loud is a nice way to get to the point quickly at a cocktail party. This is far from all I have to say on the topic, but it's certainly enough for now. Just remember one thing: Hon. Gerald Kelleher's grievances are as appealing as braces, acne, and a wooden leg at the senior prom.

--
Need Mercedes parts ? - http://parts.mbz.org
Richard Sexton | Mercedes stuff: http://mbz.org
1970 280SE, 72 280SE | Home page: http://rs79.vrx.net
633CSi 250SE/C 300SD | http://aquaria.net http://killi.net
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 268 participants?
    ... There is more sophistication in flat Earthers,that is the only ... They and you have one single value to protect (24 hours/360 degrees ... for axial rotation) as part of a heritage where clocks emerged from ...
    (alt.horology)
  • Re: Clocks,terrestial longitudes and axial rotation
    ... It is time once again to prove that "oriel36" is an software program ... watches and clocks represent the meshing of many human disciplines to ... generate that standard pace which emerges as equable hours,minutes and ... to axial rotation at 15 degrees per hour exactly making 24 hours/360 ...
    (alt.horology)
  • Re: Before the nonsense breaks out
    ... oriel36 wrote: ... geometric certainty that axial rotation through 360 degrees is Not ... the earth (with respect to a sidereal reference) take? ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)