Re: 268 participants?
- From: "oriel36" <geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Feb 2006 10:23:24 -0800
The people with diseased minds are most certainly in the majority and
that is what is disconcerting,normally the bad 17th century oversight
of justifying axial rotation to the background stars * would have been
recognised and dealt with but there is nothing normal in this dismal
and dark era.
The subtlety of the heliocentric adaption of the Equation of Time
principles in facilitating clocks built around axial rotation at 15
degrees per hour is not so obvious to the rest of humanity but at least
they already know the Earth rotates through 360 degrees in 24 hours.
Somebody must have an idea that when something so basic is
perverted,even without knowing the full details,the great destruction
must follow and follow it did.Any time a person encounters the early
20th century concepts of relativity/qm they are witnessing the outward
symptoms of a 17th century disease.
As for you lousy freaks,what can be said to talentless people who just
happen to inherit a rich tradition as though a watch were found
underneath a rock.Perhaps that you are a disgrace to your families and
to your children for although unfamiliarity with the material can be
excused and forgiven, to willingly carry on and be part of a group of
people who make themselves look ridiculous for the sake of an empirical
cult gets its own rewards.
You don't insult me you insult yourselves
* http://www.nmm.ac.uk/server/show/conMediaFile.5445
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: Richard Sexton
- Re: 268 participants?
- References:
- 268 participants?
- From: ahmed
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: Richard Sexton
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: Frank Adam
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: Wireless Lou
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: Frank Adam
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: oriel36
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: The Baron
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: bogart . lloy
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: oriel36
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: oriel36
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: ahmed
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: oriel36
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: ahmed
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: Tony Stanford
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: ticktock
- 268 participants?
- Prev by Date: Re: 268 participants?
- Next by Date: Re: Need a referral / vintage bucherer
- Previous by thread: Re: 268 participants?
- Next by thread: Re: 268 participants?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|