Re: 268 participants?
- From: "ticktock" <ieb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Feb 2006 08:47:13 -0800
Hi everybody,
Pressure of work has kept me offline for a couple of weeks... I have
just picked up on the threads, returned from 'the land of slumber'
where all great lurkers hide, ... and what do I find... that pillock
'oriel36' is still being encouraged to ramble on in his demented
psuedo-intellectual way.
Guys, I seem to recall some discussion where it had been decided to
veto this poster with the obvious mental aberation (yes ...I mean
'nutter'... but shhhhh in case he hears me) ... and simply not respond
to his ramblings.
Now I know why folks exclaim 'Jeezus-wept' (I feel like joining Him)
.... has nothing moved on at all in the past...-...how many weeks is it
Tony since we emailed about your 'Singapore Sandoz'? ... 3? 4? 5? (how
did it work out by the way?).
This is really depressing.... my thought for today was .... 'I'll make
some time to catch up on what the guys are doing over at 'alt.horology'
...." ... I left (figuratively) with the ramblings of our resident loon
ringing in my ears (if you get the picture), and I return to find the
same (or a similar thread) still churning along.
Do you guys never get bored... surely there's no fun in baiting a moron
to step into the same trap over and over again. Has this been going on
for all the weeks I've been offline? Surely not?
As I said at the opening ... I thought it had been decided to ignore
the psychotic ramblings of 'oriel36' and freeze his prattle... it is
surely obvious to all that he has a real mental health problem, did
your Mommy not teach you not to throw stones at the village idiot, or
tie tin cans to the tails of the local moggies. Is it not time to
simply freeze this rubbish out.
Can we not do that, and not encourage the twerp....... ?! please !?
Otherwise I'll be forced into permanent hibernation to prevent my brain
cell from exploding, (ouch ouch I can feel the pain already).
#-(
IanB
.
- Follow-Ups:
- 'oriel36'
- From: invalid
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: oriel36
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: Tony Stanford
- 'oriel36'
- References:
- 268 participants?
- From: ahmed
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: Richard Sexton
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: Frank Adam
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: Wireless Lou
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: Frank Adam
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: oriel36
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: The Baron
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: bogart . lloy
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: oriel36
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: oriel36
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: ahmed
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: oriel36
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: ahmed
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: Tony Stanford
- 268 participants?
- Prev by Date: Re: Need a referral / vintage bucherer
- Next by Date: Re: hotreplica.com
- Previous by thread: Re: 268 participants?
- Next by thread: Re: 268 participants?
- Index(es):