Re: 268 participants?
- From: "oriel36" <geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Feb 2006 05:23:02 -0800
ahmed wrote:
oriel36 wrote:
Hope !,
Those who Know they do not Know that to Know is to Know what they do
not Know!
- (Aveccina) Ali Sina
what hope have you given people who cannot defend themselves
against your nonsense,that you are party to the most stupid concept
possible where you can't give the correct value for the rotation of the
Earth on its axis.
Do not query HIS work!
"Put aside your pride,
Set down your arrogance,
And remember your grave."
- Ali ibn Abu Talib (radiAllahu anhu)
These creeps here convince themselves that the Earth's rotation is a
poor gauge for the pace of a clock and subsequently equable
hours,minutes and seconds.
What they seem incapable of appreceating is that the transfer from
pre-Copernican principles of the equable 24 hour day to its
heliocentric adaption to axial rotation makes it impossible to alter
the relationship between 15 deg of rotation each hour.
Nothing is easier to understand or more satisfying in content and
character yet many centuries after it was known how accurate clocks
refer to terrestial rotation and how the clock method resolved
longitude.I still have to contend with creeps who reason the
equivalency out of existence.
I hate the thoughts that people who could appreceate the principles
easily are driven away by voodoo linguistic drivel yet I will make
certain that the original 24 hour/360 degre principles will be restored
to where they once stood in their brilliance against the cretinous
calendrically driven conceptions of contemporaries.I dare not call
people here horologists for they are not.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: ahmed
- Re: 268 participants?
- References:
- 268 participants?
- From: ahmed
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: Richard Sexton
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: Frank Adam
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: Wireless Lou
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: Frank Adam
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: oriel36
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: The Baron
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: bogart . lloy
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: oriel36
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: oriel36
- Re: 268 participants?
- From: ahmed
- 268 participants?
- Prev by Date: Re: Seiko 5?
- Next by Date: Re: Oceanus OCW500TDA-1AV
- Previous by thread: Re: 268 participants?
- Next by thread: Re: 268 participants?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading