Re: Shock resistivity quartz vs. mechanical
- From: "meisterme" <mygooglenews@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Jan 2006 22:58:41 -0800
I have a few friends ( don't know each other) that have the same
quartz Omega Seamaster. A > $1000 quartz watch where the seconds
hands don't hit the seconds marks..... but "almost" every other seiko
and swiss army I come across hits the seconds markers. They are
real....sapphire, finish is top notch.
Was at the local tourneau and for kicks checked their display quartz
seamaster...they had two......one hit the markers and, one did not.
Every tag I have seen, the markers are right on. Puzzles me why such a
higher end top brand quartz watch is hit and miss with seconds markers
not being hit right on
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Shock resistivity quartz vs. mechanical
- From: Honest John
- Re: Shock resistivity quartz vs. mechanical
- From: dAz
- Re: Shock resistivity quartz vs. mechanical
- References:
- Shock resistivity quartz vs. mechanical
- From: JS
- Re: Shock resistivity quartz vs. mechanical
- From: Jack Denver
- Re: Shock resistivity quartz vs. mechanical
- From: JS
- Re: Shock resistivity quartz vs. mechanical
- From: Honest John
- Re: Shock resistivity quartz vs. mechanical
- From: JS
- Re: Shock resistivity quartz vs. mechanical
- From: dAz
- Re: Shock resistivity quartz vs. mechanical
- From: Jack Denver
- Shock resistivity quartz vs. mechanical
- Prev by Date: Re: Shock resistivity quartz vs. mechanical
- Next by Date: Re: Shock resistivity quartz vs. mechanical
- Previous by thread: Re: Shock resistivity quartz vs. mechanical
- Next by thread: Re: Shock resistivity quartz vs. mechanical
- Index(es):