Re: Given a chance
- From: "John S." <hjsjms@xxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Jan 2006 17:57:08 -0800
oriel36 wrote:
> To Jack Denver
>
> There never was and never will be an astronomical justification which
> generates the perception of axial rotation through 360 degrees in 23
> hours 56 minutes 04 sec.
>
> It is easier to present how the pre-Copernican principle of the
> equable 24 hour day was adapted by heliocentrists to axial rotation at
> 15 degrees per hour with the Equation of Time as the common factor.It
> is also one of the most satisfying and enjoyable principles ever
> devised by humans yet it appears that most favor the sidereal fairytale
> devised in the 17th century by celestial cataloguers.I refuse to
> believe that people whio are familiar with watches and clocks would
> adopt the wrong value for the one motion what makes clocks possible -
> the independent motion of the Earth on its axis.
>
> The consequences of adopting the wrong value for axial rotation and the
> astronomical justification start to emerge in many different areas
> where the accurate relationship betwen axial and orbital motions are
> required such as climatology and geology.
>
> Then there is astronomy -
>
> http://www.pfm.howard.edu/astronomy/Chaisson/AT401/IMAGES/AACHCIR0.JPG
>
> Go ahead and put the bogus .986 degree orbital displacement in an
> elliptical framework and watch the ugly spectacle of the Earth
> travelling faster at the point furthest from the Sun (aphelion) and
> slower at the point closest to the Sun (perihelion) in direct conflict
> with Kepler's seond law *.
>
> I have intentionally kept the material as tight as possible to
> watchmaking and the original principles by which clocks were calibrated
> from natural noon and the application of the Equation of Time
> correction.Finding people who want to support to exceptionally ugly
> sidereal principles is easy enough but absolutely nobody supports the
> original Equation of Time format which provides the core principles
> everyone here will use today.
>
> The main reason for the opposition is that Newton built his ballistic
> agenda applied to planetary motion on the sidereal justification and
> few have the courage or competence to do the necessary forensics on how
> he achieved his objective.He has one thing in his favor,he was
> consistent in his misconduct or misjudgement and I assure you it is all
> based on the simple maneuver of altering the astronomical justification
> of axial rotation from 24 hours/360 degrees to 23 hours 56 min 04
> sec/360 deg.
>
> * http://www.mhhe.com/physsci/astronomy/fix/student/images/04f15.jpg
OK. To bring this back to a level that we all can understand tell me
how you would design a wristwatch according to your principles. And
then please explain how it will improve upon the performance of to two
of my favorite watches: A Seiko Perpetual quartz and a Titoni
Airmaster mechanical.
.
- References:
- Given a chance
- From: oriel36
- Re: Given a chance
- From: Jack Denver
- Re: Given a chance
- From: oriel36
- Given a chance
- Prev by Date: Re: Opinions Please
- Next by Date: Re: time tracking function in radio controlled clocks
- Previous by thread: 'bot identification: oriel36
- Next by thread: Re: Given a chance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading