Re: alt.horology watch
- From: "Mooron" <mooron@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Sep 2005 13:34:04 -0700
Honest John wrote:
> "Frank Adam" <fajp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> "Look out for the crazy ones."
>
> ? cRaZy ?
>
> Look On My Words, Ye Mighty, And Despair!
> Nevertheless, the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is not to be
> considered in determining the traditional practice of grammarians. Thus a
> subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is not
> subject to the strong generative capacity of the theory. Of course, the
> notion of level of grammaticalness is necessary to impose an interpretation
> on the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance
> scope of a complex symbol. Conversely, any associated supporting element is
> to be regarded as an abstract underlying order. Furthermore, this analysis
> of a formative as a pair of sets of features does not readily tolerate
> irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.
I have no idea what that's all about, but I totally agree with you.
- Mooron
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: alt.horology watch
- From: Frank Adam
- Re: alt.horology watch
- References:
- alt.horology watch
- From: Mooron
- Re: alt.horology watch
- From: Tony Stanford
- Re: alt.horology watch
- From: Frank Adam
- Re: alt.horology watch
- From: Honest John
- alt.horology watch
- Prev by Date: Re: alt.horology watch
- Next by Date: Re: IWC watches
- Previous by thread: Re: alt.horology watch
- Next by thread: Re: alt.horology watch
- Index(es):