Re: Some rolex thoughts
- From: "John S." <hjsjms@xxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Aug 2005 07:57:15 -0700
Fraser Johnston wrote:
> "John S." <hjsjms@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1123680128.796671.313180@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > That's an advertisers dream...to have consumers continue to repeat
> > advertising copy as though it was the truth. There really never was a
> > time when Rolex was the producer the most accurate watch. They have
> > always had a lot of competition. And of course by 1984 the performance
> > of Rolex and other mechanical chronometers had been completely eclipsed
> > by inexpensive quartz timed watches from asia.
>
> That's why they are still making mega bucks. Just as people ask for a Coke
> and not a cola fizzy drink. They advertising of machine of Rolex is
> certainly something to be admired. Can't be cheap to run.
Oh, yes they certainly give every indication of being very successful.
That is quite an achievement actually. I would imagine their return is
substantial on the money spent in advertising.
> Fraser
.
- Follow-Ups:
- It's kind of bizarre that people pride themselves on being ripped off.
- From: Your Name Here
- It's kind of bizarre that people pride themselves on being ripped off.
- References:
- Some rolex thoughts
- From: Fraser Johnston
- Re: Some rolex thoughts
- From: John S.
- Re: Some rolex thoughts
- From: Fraser Johnston
- Some rolex thoughts
- Prev by Date: Re: Why serious collectors should own fakes
- Next by Date: Re: Naughty remark on American cars
- Previous by thread: Re: Some rolex thoughts
- Next by thread: It's kind of bizarre that people pride themselves on being ripped off.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|