Re: "atomic" watches...
- From: "Mij Adyaw" <mijadyaw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:35:30 -0700
They are also EXTREMELY INACCURATE when they do not receive a signal for
several days. Since they are radio controlled, they cut cost on the internal
oscillator and therefore it drifts excessively.
"Jack Denver" <nunuvyer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8s6dnbnij8kwmHTfRVn-gw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> These watches are not "atomic" at all but rather radio controlled. Each
> country that broadcasts a time signal has its own radio time signal
> transmitter and these differ as to frequency, signal code, etc. So a
> "US" only model RC watch would not work if you moved out of range of the
> US transmitter in Boulder, Colorado. There are some "multi-frequency"
> watches available that pick up the Japan and German signals as well (the
> other main signals). I don't know whether OZ is in range of any signal.
>
> The watches do automatically compensate for DST.
>
>
>
> "Ian Kirby" <ijk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:42e8388c$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Hi people,
>> Will a watch purchased from, say, the USA, which has its time
>> maintained by pulses from an atomic clock somewhere in the USA also, be
>> useable elsewhere in the world? What happens when one moves from one
>> time zone to another, and do they have automatic compensation for
>> daylight saving time?
>> Thanks, Ian Kirby.
>> Wollongong NSW Australia
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "atomic" watches...
- From: Jack Denver
- Re: "atomic" watches...
- References:
- "atomic" watches...
- From: Ian Kirby
- Re: "atomic" watches...
- From: Jack Denver
- "atomic" watches...
- Prev by Date: Re: "atomic" watches...
- Next by Date: Re: "atomic" watches...
- Previous by thread: Re: "atomic" watches...
- Next by thread: Re: "atomic" watches...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|