Re: Test Post .... Please Ignore (again)

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:41:18 -0700, "Bob F" <bobnospam@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


"Sam E" <no.email@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pu81141jo7n8j11bfcg73gbqmat9fnjudr@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:48:00 -0500, Art Todesco <actodesco@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Test

It's not working right, both of your junk posts appeared in a
newsgroup where they aren't appropriate.

Also, why not actually include something on-topic?

Or, in other words, use "alt.test" or some other test group for tests.


Right. I just get tired of saying the same thing all the time.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Very close to giving up ...
    ... This just reinforces your newcomer status. ... You don't have the posting history to even be considering this. ... most of the junk posts are cross-posted. ... what you desire on a longstanding newsgroup. ...
    (rec.radio.shortwave)
  • Re: test (Was: wonder if it works)
    ... It posted a test post to a non-testing ... newsgroup. ... Or of course posted to a 'personal' test group that never sees Usenet at ...
    (news.software.readers)
  • Re: [OT] Please excuse test post
    ... a test group would not help in rectifying this or identifying the problem. ... have shown a quasi-random pattern: ... occur in any newsgroup. ...
    (uk.telecom.broadband)
  • Re: test
    ... forgive you for posting to an active newsgroup instead of properly to a ... Here are some links to help you have a good newsgroup ... microsoft.public.test.here - MS test group ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)
  • Re: test
    ... forgive you for posting to an active newsgroup instead of to a test ... microsoft.public.test.here - MS test group ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)