Re: Goodbye 100w, 75w Incandescent Lamps
- From: "Pete C." <aux3.DOH.4@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 01:04:27 GMT
Tony Hwang wrote:
Pete C. wrote:
Tony Hwang wrote:Hi,
Tony Hwang wrote:
Jim Redelfs wrote:
The Nanny Geniuses in D.C. just passed legislation that, in addition
to putting some serious "hurt" on our domestic car and light truck
industry, kills off those outmoded, wasteful and environmentally
DEVASTATING electric lamps we've all come to know and love.
Say "goodbye" to the venerable 100w and 75w, cheap, light bulb.
(Thomas Alva Edison will surely turn over in his grave).
Stock-up and horde 'em now, folks. They'll be worth a LOT in 10-15
years on the black market.
I just switched all my exterior entryways and garage "eyebrow"
fixtures to CF lamps. I am considering switching BACK the one beside
the front door.
I rarely use exterior lighting. Mostly, I switch-on the front porch
light when there is someone at the door - a rare occurrence.
On those occasions, I want IMMEDIATE light.
However, right now, it is 12F outside and that curly, compact
fluorescent lamp outside, by the front door, doesn't provide usable
light worth a damn for a minute or two.
With no apologies to anyone, I believe that switching to CF lamps
won't, over the LONG "haul", provide a bit of "relief" to our
ever-increasing energy consumption. Although that implies that our
ever-increasing energy consumption needs relief, I am adamantly
UNconvinced of that in any case.
The Energy Bill provided for NO new energy.
All the windmills, solar panels, methane plants and CF bulbs in the
world cannot, and never will, provide for our energy needs.
Conservation alone is NOT the answer, even IF there were a problem.
We have adequate stores of fossil fuels to keep our grandchildren's
grandchildren's grandchildren cool or warm and productive. Whether we
can overcome all the hand-wringing, crybaby, do-gooders that think
they're saving something by declaring wide swaths of our land "off
limits" to fossil fuel harvesting is another matter.
We learned how to do it cleanly, neatly and with minimal environmental
impact YEARS ago. But that's not good enough now. We simply CAN'T do
it because of some PERCEIVED, detrimental environmental impact.
That's B.S.
How about slashing the "red tape" and getting a few, new nuclear power
generating stations on-line within ten years?
We should drill for oil and gas in ANWR (Alaska National Wildlife
Refuge)?
Why do you think Seward talked Congress into buying Alaska?
Do you think he would have ever believed that there'd come a day when
vast miles of it would be virtually off-limits to any resource
harvesting?
Despite incessant impediments from environmentalists, the Tans-Alaska
Pipeline was finally built. But, Shazam! The devastation to the
environment and wildlife it was predicted to cause never happened.
They were WRONG. They're wrong now.
CF bulbs and set-back thermostats are NOT the final solution, even if
there was a problem. Heck, such measures aren't even a viable stop-gap.
We need more energy. Let's go get it. -Jim Redelfs
Hmmm,
I am waiting for LED bulbs.
Hi,
Nearby town of Banff installed LED street lights with solar panels.
Very cool looking light and it is cool running, no bugs get attracted
kep them clean. Cost a lot initially but for the long run, it's winner.
LED bulbs now are expensive but with time the price will come down.
I have a few small ones in the house, they use couple Watts per bulb.
I'd have to see those to believe them, unless they are the purely
cosmetic kind. I've yet to see any LED source that can compare to a 400W
HID source.
The high tech commercial version with solar charger is a reality which
at present beyond common consumer market. Banff main street just
underwent a total facelift and that's what they chose. It's real thing!
60W light bulb comparable LED one is ~80.00 at present. Think it's
matter o time the swill drop. My sauna interior and exterior light
is LED packs with multi-color option for mood. I can set it to single
color or dancing random color. No heat, no burning for LONG time.
I have no doubt LEDs will get where they need to be fairly quickly.
Certainly the LED traffic signals and LED warning light bars are now
quite good. The 60W equiv. LED light for $80 is competing with CFLs at
$1.50 and with a color temperature and light distribution that just
isn't acceptable yet. Fix the color temp, light distribution and get the
cost down to $20 and they'll probably start selling in reasonable
quantity.
.
- References:
- Goodbye 100w, 75w Incandescent Lamps
- From: Jim Redelfs
- Re: Goodbye 100w, 75w Incandescent Lamps
- From: Tony Hwang
- Re: Goodbye 100w, 75w Incandescent Lamps
- From: Tony Hwang
- Re: Goodbye 100w, 75w Incandescent Lamps
- From: Pete C.
- Re: Goodbye 100w, 75w Incandescent Lamps
- From: Tony Hwang
- Goodbye 100w, 75w Incandescent Lamps
- Prev by Date: Re: How to remove burned bark?
- Next by Date: Re: How to remove burned bark?
- Previous by thread: Re: Goodbye 100w, 75w Incandescent Lamps
- Next by thread: Re: Goodbye 100w, 75w Incandescent Lamps
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|