Re: composite decking



On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 19:53:34 -0700, Joe <jbobst4@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jun 7, 10:38 pm, <j...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1181267935.458921.248...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
jbob...@xxxxxxx says...

Concrete doesn't decay.

You've missed all the threads over the years about trying to keep a
concrete patio/driveway/sidewalk looking reasonably clean and new?

--
j...@xxxxxxxxx is Joshua Putnam
<http://www.phred.org/~josh/>
Updated Infrared Photography Gallery:
<http://www.phred.org/~josh/photo/ir.html>

IMHO deck obsessors outnumber driveway/patio obsessors by a large
margin. FWIW, my nifty patio gets hosed off every few years (in the
midwest here) and looks just great after nearly 20 years. Most of the
threads in this NG relating to concrete cleaning problems are the
result of easily avoided owner disasters and sometimes sloppy
contractor mistakes. So there!

We had a dark pink or light red "tinted"** cement patio for 8 years
until we moved, and we never did anything to it and it always looked
fine. **I don't know how they made it.

I must admit I've wondered why I need a deck, and so far the only
reason is that otherwise it would be 3 steps down. The patio above
was level with the screened in porch which was level with the den
inside.

On the side of the previous house was a pillared porch with a roof,
that we screened in, that was level with the dining room, but one step
up from the ground for the outside entrance to the porch.

Why not put three steps down at the door instead of at the far side of
the deck (and use a patio instead of a deck)? I guess because it
would look like the cheap rowhouses I drive by frequently, who have a
couple steps down and just a slab of cement 2x3 feet, then a yard,
with no trees. It would look cheap to have a step down, or 3, right
from the house. A screened in porch would make such a transition not
look cheap. In theory I should only care about what it is, and not
what it looks like, that it "looks cheap", and I think usually I do,
and if so, this is for some reason an exception.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: new deck - feedback wanted (auspex + potence)
    ... David Morgan is a good deal for the deck, ... There is no good reason for this deck to not be 90 cards, ... combat and high card cycling, there are good reasons not to be less than 90. ... Earthshock is fantastic, but I'd probably go with 5 Earthshock/8 Immortal ...
    (rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad)
  • Re: Black smoke from a 106?
    ... Step daughter needs a car quick (Astra diesel has probable cracked ... Her cousin has one (it didn't really matter what it was within reason) ... cheap basic 'transport' for someone with little money or car interest ...
    (uk.rec.cars.maintenance)
  • Re: Euro Star
    ... simply don't want to get into the business of those simply out on cheap ... they could put the cheap tickets' compulsory reserved ... I'd suggest the reason they don't offer much cheaper returns is related ... John Band ...
    (uk.transport.london)
  • Re: Rapid Thought Revised
    ... objecting for changes to deck sizes. ... I was just looking for the reason ... be the least bit valid for this game. ... I mean, if comes down to it, why not assume it should be 52 cards because ...
    (rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad)
  • Re: Rapid Thought Revised
    ... objecting for changes to deck sizes. ... I was just looking for the reason ... be the least bit valid for this game. ... I mean, if comes down to it, why not assume it should be 52 cards because ...
    (rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad)

Loading