Re: Er, Uh, Kinda important

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:00:31 -0500, Duane Bozarth wrote:

>> > My intent was the reverse...<because> it is one of four redundant
>> > systems in a backup system, this <particular> sensor <isn't> all that
>> > important...

>> Your intent (and you) are wrong.

> How can you demonstrate that other than personal belief? I do not
> believe I am wrong based on what NASA said in the news conference that I
> saw and their announced decision to fly w/o it...if you have factual
> information you can reference that shows an error in what I have said,
> I'd be happy to reconsider.

You'll be happy to reconsider what, exactly? That the sensor isn't
important? If it wasn't, why was the mission scrubbed two weeks ago?
Also, the sensor was working this morning, there was no "decision to fly
without it". Discovery is now in space, let's just leave it at that.

--
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951

.