Re: William Wallace vs. Shaka Zulu

VOR <locust.of.control@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
RichL wrote:
VOR <locust.of.control@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
RichL wrote:
VOR <locust.of.control@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
RichL wrote:
Les Cargill <lcargill@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
VOR wrote:
<snip>
If a Greek or Roman soldier threw a spear, then he would be a
spear-chucker. I mean that literally but certainly not
derogatorily.
Don't whizz on my leg and tell me it's raining, son.

<snip>


http://www.hulu.com/watch/1477/saturday-night-live-word-association
Perfect!!
Not really. Not at all actually. You need to read my comments to
Les. It would have been 'perfect' if I were a sanctimonious,
politically correct lemming who got caught saying something
politically incorrect. A good example of that would be when Twibil
accidentally called homosexuality a birth defect (also known as
Twibilgate).

I am an unabashed defender of Western civilization and will not
temper my comments to please anyone.


(p.s...you haven't read the script. "VOR" is supposed to be a
female character <chortle>)


I am the one who is laughing, RichL.

What would lead you to believe that I am anything other than a
woman?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissociative_identity_disorder


Sorry, I am still not Daniel.

You are so funny without even trying, RichL. :-)

Come on, you can do better than that. I think I introduced myself to
you when I first began posting here. I made my identity clear. There
has to be some specific reason as to why you don't think I'm a
woman?

It goes to credibility.

You may or may not be "Daniel". However it's clear that the pas de
deux that the two of you engaged in here is not on the level.

It's on the level as far as I'm concerned. I realize more than anyone
that his new views are out of character. I have to assume something
traumatic happened to him and accept what he now says as the truth as
he sees it even though it sickens me.



You claim to be a woman scorned, yet you continue to brag about
"Daniel's" supposed sexual prowess. Your exchanges with him are
littered with little winkies, etc.


Well, I am a firm believer in giving credit where credit is due. Some
people have low self-esteem and need to demonize their past lovers.
Although I am disappointed and thoroughly shocked by Daniel's recent
change, that doesn't alter what happened in the past. He and I were
very compatible and enjoyed each other immensely. I'm not going to
lie and pretend that wasn't the case just because his new views make
me want to vomit. It isn't as though I provided a graphic
play-by-play description detailing every position and each orgasm, so
I hardly feel as though I bragged about his prowess. Suffice it to
say, we had an extremely pleasurable relationship given the
geographic distance between us. Of course, that is all in the past
now. I don't feel like a woman scorned; rather, I feel like a woman
totally blindsided by his abandonment of the values and beliefs we
shared.

Would it seem more realistic in your mind if I lashed out with small
*** and premature ejaculation insults? Neither are true about Daniel,
so spreading vicious lies would accomplish nothing. I've never
understood people who lash out so vulgarly about others in their life
because it really says far more about them, their standards and their
character than it does about the other person. Don't you agree?

The little winkies I often include in my text aren't usually of a
flirtatious nature. As of late, the winkies I send his way intended to
express my contempt. I feel quite confident he knows this, so it is a
small measure to add a bit more sting to a verbal slap in the face.


Sorry, I'm not buying any of it. "Daniel" has inflicted us with his
carefully orchestrated scripts many times in the past. The only
remaining question this time is whether there is one performer or
two.



I wouldn't know about any of that. Daniel and I rarely discussed the
Internet in private conversations.

If what you say about his past actions is true, then I can appreciate
your cautious nature. Even so, you interact with me differently than
you interact with him. I feel you know I am exactly who and what I
said I was and believe that accounts for your tendency to use a
gentler tone and more civil approach when you speak to me.

I interact extremely cordially with White Spirit when he's not playing
games.


.

Loading