Re: Valve Jr. version 2 vs. version 3
- From: "RichL" <rpleavitt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:42:38 -0500
Mark Bedingfield <atari030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
RichL wrote:
RS <RS@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 00:03:13 -0500, "RichL" <rpleavitt@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
yowie <yowie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Rich, Going by those schematics:
The schematics are here:Thanks, that's very helpful! (I was able to download the pdf
http://www.sewatt.com/files/sewatt/StockVJ_1-3.pdf
You need to sign up to sewatt.com if you haven't already.
without signing up by clicking directly on your link,
interestingly enough).
I'm tempted to go ahead and buy a V3 to keep stock and tinker with
the V2.
The low input impedance of the V1 and V2 versions doesn't make sense
for a guitar amp. The low impedance will also load down a humbucker
more than it would a single coil (though both would lose top end),
so that's probably what you were hearing. Also, the two 68K
resistors on the input form a divider--that will lose half the
signal before it even gets to stage 1. That's bad for
signal-to-noise.
Another difference V2->V3: The cathode resistors are changed from
2.2k to 1.5k. That will change the operating point of those tubes,
but not drastically. I'd say that's optional.
The third difference: Output transformer changed from 7.5K primary
to 5K: Probably a good thing. But I doubt that you'd want to buy
another output transformer just to get this changed.
So... The biggest factor is probably just the 1M input resistor. So
I doubt that you need to be cautious about downtime. Just open it
and change the resistor.
If you're thinking of other mods, there are a few things I could
suggest if you're interested. The divider formed by R6, R7, and VR1
(volume control) will lose quite a bit of signal. This is probably
intentional, to keep the amp clean at lower settings of the volume
control. But it affords a convenient spot to boost some frequencies,
should you choose to do that.
Yup, after looking over the schematics I realized that the input
resistor was #1 in the sound difference. As I mentioned, my
particular VJ gets into distortion territory pretty quickly so I
probably don't want to up the signal level.
Is there any variation between pups and speakers that affect the
headroom in your setup Rich?
A couple of things I noticed, 1, with the Big Muff guitar volume
control is essential to get good tone, Boss OS-2 and Ibanez TS-10 not
so difficult. I'd assume other Muff/Fuzz pedals would be similar. 2,
EMG's drive the VJ pretty hard and also require taming with the
guitars volume control. With my Greenback clone I get around 50%
volume with my passive Strats before it will start to break up. About
35-40% with the EMG's.
Mark
I don't have any guitars with actives. There's some headroom
differences among the different guitars I've used with it; more clean
headroom with the Strat and Gretsch than anything else, less with the SG
than anything else.
I've only used the VJ with two speaker sets; the closed 4 x 12 Marshall
1960 cab and the greenbacks in my AC30. The greenbacks definitely sound
better but I don't think there's a significant difference in headroom.
I haven't used many pedals with the VJ other than the Keeley Java treble
booster; I need to fool around with some others.
.
- References:
- Valve Jr. version 2 vs. version 3
- From: RichL
- Re: Valve Jr. version 2 vs. version 3
- From: RichL
- Re: Valve Jr. version 2 vs. version 3
- From: RS
- Re: Valve Jr. version 2 vs. version 3
- From: RichL
- Re: Valve Jr. version 2 vs. version 3
- From: Mark Bedingfield
- Valve Jr. version 2 vs. version 3
- Prev by Date: Re: Best way to fill screw holes?
- Next by Date: Re: Scott Lifshine is the world's greatest filmmaker
- Previous by thread: Re: Valve Jr. version 2 vs. version 3
- Next by thread: Re: Valve Jr. version 2 vs. version 3
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading