Re: Renli & Romeo Rose head to head!


"Renli" <oliver.richman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1f50599b-c3dd-435e-bb88-3a5a28e84d3b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 13, 1:08 pm, "Wog George" <wog-NotThisBit-geo...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

I may be a beginner but I am improving, a few people said they
actually liked what I did, or at least, that it was better than romeo
rose. Honestly, we don't need people like you to comment.

I respect that you're a beginner of quite some years now. I'm a beginner
in
many respects, but I don't issue US$100 challenges and I don't try to
score
points by showing the world that I'm better than another poster,
irrespective of how chronic that poster's playing may be.

You don't? That's rather ironic considering what you did to start this
flamewar. Chalk it up to how you are known to lie, I guess.


Please post evidence of known lies posted by me, excluding my obvious lies
in relation to your posts.

I didn't listen to Romeo Rose's playing - I've heard it before - but I
heard
what you played and, in the context of how you presented it (ie "listen
to
how much better I am than this other guy"), it got exactly what it
deserved.

You're putting words in my mouth yet again. I didn't insinuate it was
better. That's why the subject of this thread is a "head to head". But
I guess you can't understand that. Try thinking next time.


So you were meaning "Gather 'round and hear how much worse I play than this
fellow poster"?

If you'd said "Hey guys, I'm just getting the hang of this. Tell me how
I'm
going.", I may have responded differently. You set the context, and I
merely replied in kind.

You mean, in unkind.

Your approach begged for unkindness.


I have alluded that you're as dumb as a box of hammers, which isn't
strictly
correct. You're obviously not completely devoid of intellect. You do,
however, lack some basic communication skills. Tact is one that
immediately
springs to mind.

I don't respond well to assholism. I can admit that. Maybe one day I
can change. I've changed a lot so far, so one more thing isn't going
to be that difficult.


Let's get you to go that one step further then. How about replying to the
following that you snecked from my previous reply, which apparently proved
too difficult for you on the first attempt. I said:

<quote>

Really? Please provide evidence of surreptitious post-editing by me (the
poster known as Wog George), and of my subsequent responses to those
post-edited quotes. You're in the running for the top of the podium when
the degree of difficulty (ie impossibility) is taken into account.

</quote>

Consider this to be an exercise of self-improvement.

--
George
"If I was a towel, why would I be wearing this hat and this fake
moustache" - Steven McTowelie - 19 April 2006


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: I heard about this showing of Jesus on the news.
    ... The sincerity of this poster may be judged from the fact that he ... >>> Please provide evidence that you are better qualified to translate ... >>> someone who is better qualified to translate than Nathaniel Lardner was. ... First the post of a load of second-hand lies about ...
    (soc.religion.quaker)
  • OT: How many denials... Was - Re: How many laptop owners...
    ... He also openly lies about me, such as his lies that I posted what Carroll ... I wonder if the person (poster B) who wrote the following admission ... quotes of context and make it look like views have changed... ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: OT: Who is the stupidest RGP poster? Day 10
    ... since I have documented your lies for all to ... It must really piss you off that ruylopez, MBBJ, as well as Bill T, ... another intelligent poster, ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • BEHIND EVERY FILTHY POST IS A FILTHY MUZZIE POSTER
    ... BEHIND EVERY FILTHY POST IS A FILTHY MUZZIE POSTER ... Inaccurate, Full of lies, Stupid posts, Lunatic stories, obscene language. ...
    (alt.religion.islam)
Loading