Re: Apology
- From: Andy <nospam@xxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:47:38 +1000
Cyberserf wrote:
On Apr 23, 11:49 pm, Guncho <cgun...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Apr 23, 10:41 pm, Rick N. Backer <ken.wil...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 23 Apr 2007 15:25:24 -0700, Guncho <cgun...@xxxxxxxxxxx> didI read newsgroups through google.
courageously avow:
On Apr 23, 6:18 pm, The Repair Guy <repairguy1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Are you seriously that obtuse?Guncho <cgun...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:That's how I read newsgroups.That's a URL, champ.www.google.comWhat program do you use to view GoogleYou don't use a newsreader. You useIt's what I use to read the newsgroups so.....
Google groups. HTH.
It's my news group reader or my newsreader.
groups? Which "newsreader", I mean?
Agent? Gravity? Xnews?
The Repair Guy
repairguy1993 dot netfirms dot com
http://groups.google.com/
--
Ken Wilson
Amer. Dlx. Tele, Gary Moore LP, LP DC Classic w/P90s,
Jeff Beck Strat, Morgan OM Acoustic,
Rick 360/12, Std. Strat (MIM), Mesa Lone Star Special,
Mesa F-30
"Goodnight Austin, Texas, wherever you are."- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
newsgroup read
news read
news reader
Newsreader!
:)
Chris- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I with you on this one Chris...these guys are splitting pubes,
presumably in an effort to get your goat...surely they know better.
However, in case they are genuine in their collective ignorance ...let
me offer the following:
Collective ignorance? Right...
I use Google Groups as well and here's how I would describe
it...Google has their own ActiveX/HTML/Java (?) reader/editor/archive
management software embedded in the access page
It's HTML. It's *slow* enough to be Java, but I'm pretty sure it's just regular old HTML.
...similar to the software used on many "discussion websites". With regards to Usenet, it does pretty much everything that a program like
Fortes Agent would,
Well...
Except for: Filters/killfiles, proper 3-pane display, offline reading of groups, normal browsing of just the headers, sorting the headers by your own choice of Subject/Sender/Date, expanded threads by default, the ability to 'watch' threads as well as ignore entire threads at the click of a button, labelling threads by importance, creation of local folders to save posts for later reference, sent items automatically saved...
Oh, and those of us using Thunderbird also have our email clients running all the time in the same program, something which AFAICT Google Groups will never be able to offer ;-) Oh, and we don't have to waste bandwidth downloading 'sponsored links' on every slow-loading page of HTML code.
(Yo, pedants...Web Browsers are not NewsReaders)
That would be correct.
It uses any Browser and, when you log on, you get the same views,
the same subscribed groups and the same interface
And this is meant to be a good thing? The Google Groups interface is fercking HORRIBLE. It's saving grace feature wise is it's archive going all the way back to 1981.
HTH.
Andy.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apology
- From: Cyberserf
- Re: Apology
- References:
- Re: Apology
- From: jthread
- Re: Apology
- From: The Repair Guy
- Re: Apology
- From: Guncho
- Re: Apology
- From: The Repair Guy
- Re: Apology
- From: Guncho
- Re: Apology
- From: The Repair Guy
- Re: Apology
- From: Guncho
- Re: Apology
- From: The Repair Guy
- Re: Apology
- From: Guncho
- Re: Apology
- From: Rick N . Backer
- Re: Apology
- From: Guncho
- Re: Apology
- From: Cyberserf
- Re: Apology
- Prev by Date: Re: I got the biggest write-up in World History
- Next by Date: Re: Another rockabilly gem
- Previous by thread: Re: Apology
- Next by thread: Re: Apology
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|