Re: Epiphone Elitist Series Question

G-d youre an idiot. LOL. Go back to school. Learn what context means. I
used the proper word in the proper context... using "theyre," would have
been incorrect. It would have changed the meaning from "Epiphones," arent
Gibsons, to, "They arent," Gibsons, which could have been mistakenly
construed to mean the particular model that the conversation was about. I
actually took a few seconds thought to which one more correctly left the
impression I had wanted to leave. I used it correctly you idiot. Do you
think every sentence has one meaing, one context, and that its always YOURS?
Idiot.

And just for future edification, dumbass, I have MS and my right pinky works
improperly, thus the lack of " ' " in rapidly typed sentences. We can
argue the issue all you like, but using your preference would have changed
the meaning of what I intended. Get over it. You are WRONG!


Rob

"Mack" <ICH0R0426@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:M7hCf.38037$Le2.12553@xxxxxxxxxxx
> You're trying to justify the misuse of the possessive? You mean you meant
> to write that? Lol. So let's see, what you really meant to say was, "No,
> them not Gibsons." Alright, whatever you say, pal, go back to Alabama and
> take up the banjo. Maybe them made by Gibson.
>
> "Rob Duncan" <robtakethisoutduncan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:yRZBf.53$vf2.107626@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "Thad" <spyder@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:CQXBf.365$RC1.265@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Jim Anable wrote:
>>>> Mack wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I tend not to trust anyone who doesn't know the difference between
>>>>> "they're" and "their". Jesus. Learn English if you can't learn guitar.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I assume that you meant to respond to Rob's message, and not mine?
>>>
>>> Never trust anyone who can't properly attribute Usenet posts.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thad
>>
>> Besides, the idiot was wrong. I used it in the proper context to what I
>> was meaning. Their refers to THEM. Them is... Epiphone. I was not
>> using a contraction for THEY ARE. What an idiot.
>>
>>
>> Rob
>>
>
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
    ... This demonstrates I am not an idiot by proper ... by _one_ definition from a particular context which is itself ... irrelevance. ...
    (comp.databases.theory)
  • Re: OT wow these guys are out of control
    ... No, I state them in the context of, "The link is broken, here's how to ... Again, I must say, wow, you truly are an idiot. ... Note the "according to court papers" qualifier at the end. ... or that the leak was authorized by Libby's ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: OT: Harry Potter...
    ... It was the absolutely correct definition. ... No, shit for brains, it wasn't. ... Calling something a 'premise' in that context is wrong. ... Now you're an idiot; I expect you to not understand basic concepts. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: seismic shift in the market
    ... > Stewart Robert Hinsley wrote: ... > There's also such a thing as reading in context. ... You'd think that the idiot would actually google before he made such a ... I do not believe you when you claim to be a mathematician. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: OT Are Facts Obsolete?
    ... Idiot was probably used as a pejorative term and was not proper. ... Addict is more accurate, descriptive, and carries no pejorative ... My only dispute with your post is your posit that calling Loogy an "idiot" is not proper. ...
    (rec.boats)
Loading